Author Archives: lslolo

08-04-2020 AERIAL HARASSMENT. THEY FLEW DIRECTLY AROUND MY APARTMENT AS I SIT ON THE PATIO. THEY ALSO FLEW EARLIER AS I WASIN MY KITCHEN CLEANING. I CAN GET BETTER CLOSER SHOT SINCE IM ON 2nd FLOOR. . PART OF THE TARGETED INDIVIDUALS PROGRAM TO USE SMALL COMMERCIAL PLANES, DRONES, SATELLITES, HELICOPTERS TO HARASS THE VICTIM

08-01-2020 AERIAL HARASSMENT. THEU FLEW DIRECTLY OVER ME AS I WAS MOVING. I STOPPED THE CAR IN MY PARKING LOT AND TOOK BIDEO AND PANNED DOWN TO AHOW MY APARTMENT. PART OF THE TARGETED INDIVIDUALS PROGRAM TO USE SMALL COMMERCIAL PLANES, DRONES, SATELLITES, HELICOPTERS TO HARASS THE VICTIM

BLOWNUP PHOTOS OF THE MILITARY AIRCRAFT RIDING AROUND APARTMENT AS I HAVE MOVED TO A NEW ADDRESS AND AM NOW ON THE 2ND LEVEL, AS I SAT ON THE PARIO AND PREVIOUSLY WHILE I WAS UNPACKING THE KITCHEN. 08/04/2020 little after 10:20 AM.

military cyber physiological system – Google Searchhttps://www.google.com/search?q=military+cyber+physiological+system&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safariDifferences – celerium.comAccess webinars & the online reference guide to explore CMMC controls and practices. Apply now. Free Webinars.CMMC AcademyContact UsSolutionsAd·www.ariento.com/DFARS 7012 – NIST 800-171Proven solution that has passed government audits. Backed by our compliance guarantee.Ad·www.goarmy.com/brandUnited States Army® Jobs – Make Opportunity YoursExplore Career Opportunities and Job Training in The U.S. Army. Visit goarmy.com.Ad·www.todaysmilitary.com/Military Cyber Security Jobs – Explore Roles & BenefitsExplore Career Fields, Job Descriptions, Pay, Transferable Skills & More!Ad·www.raytheonintelligenceandspace.com/Raytheon Intelligence & Space – Cyber Mission Forces TrainingThe RIS PCTE solution allows military branches to train together from anywhere.Search ResultsImageDARPA (.mil) › program › high-ass…Web resultsHigh-Assurance Cyber Military Systems (HACMS) – DarpaHigh-Assurance Cyber Military Systems (HACMS) (Archived) Such devices have been networked for a variety of reasons, including the ability to conveniently access diagnostic information, perform software updates, provide innovative features, lower costs, and improve ease of use.DARPA (.mil) › program › symbioti…Symbiotic Design for Cyber Physical Systems – DarpaCyber physical systems (CPS) are instrumental to current and future Department of Defense (DoD) mission needs – unmanned vehicles, weapon systems, and mission platforms are all examples of military-relevant CPS.Imagehttps://fas.org › crs › natsecPDFDefense Primer: Cyberspace Operations – Federation of American ScientistsPEOPLE ALSO SEARCH FORwhich combatant command holds the militarycommand authority for cyberspace operationscyberspaceoperations air forceoffensive cyberspaceoperationscyber national missionforce commanderuniversal values at the coreof all military values arecyber protectionteamsImageJoint Chiefs of Staff (.mil) › p…PDFCyberspace Operations – Joint Staffby STAT SO · 2018 · Cited by 1 · Related articlesJun 8, 2018 · of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it … The Joint Functions and Cyberspace Operations . … environment, is dependent on the physical domains.104 pages·1 MBImageToday’s Military › careers › cyber-s…Cyber Security Specialists — Today’s MilitaryThey also perform deliberate actions to strengthen information systems and networks, perform vulnerability assessments, and respond to …PEOPLE ALSO ASKWhich branch of military is best for cyber security?What is cyber security military?Does Army Cyber deploy?What are the 4 cyber domains?FeedbackImageDefense.gov › Article › Article › do…Web resultsDOD’s Cyber Strategy of Past Year Outlined Before Congress > U.S. DEPARTMENT …Mar 6, 2020 · Defense leaders say U.S. cyber forces are increasingly engaged in … into military operations across all physical domains, and …ImageUnited States Naval Academy › CPSLCyber-Physical Systems Lab :: Weapons, Robotics, and… – Naval AcademyCyber-Physical Systems Lab. The scientific, industrial, and military communities, including the US Navy, have recognized the importance of …ImageRAND Corporation › pubsPDFTraining Cyber Warriors – RAND Corporationby WCBL from Defense · 2015 · Related articlesient Military Systems and the Advanced Cyber Threat,” Task Force Report, January 2013. … rent system of language training as working well :.96 pages·574 KBRAND Corporation › pubsPDFImproving the Cybersecurity of US Air Force Military Systems … – RAND Corporationby D Snyder · 2015 · Cited by 21 · Related articlesMany new and legacy military systems rely on cyber capabilities to execute their missions. There … It uses mathematical, physical, and related.ImageHealth.mil › News › In-the-SpotlightCybersecurity Awareness | Health.milProtecting Military Health System (MHS) patient health information is everyone’s … Maintain Physical Control of Your Devices … 5-Day Cyberfit Plan, Day 1: Password Protect Your DevicesAdsAd·www.maplesoft.com/Virtual Commissioning – Cyber-Physical SystemsAllow operators to train on a virtual machine without the expense of training simulators. Use Digital Twins to vastly reduce the risks of errors later in the development process.View infographicTechnologiesEvolutionBenefitsBook a demoDownload whitepaperCall (800) 267-6583Get the answer you’re looking for added to the webYour question will be shared anonymously with online publishers who may be interested in answering itMake sure you don’t include any private infoLearn moreSubmitRelated searcheshigh-assurance cyber military systemsMilitary cyber securityfm 3-12 cyberspace and electronic warfare operationsDARPAMilitary cyber security trainingMilitary Cyber Security salaryJoining the military for cyber securityDefensive cyberspace operationsPage NavigationMore results

fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/IF10537.pdf�DEFENSE CYBER PHYSIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. (AI SOFTWARE)Defense Primer: Cyberspace OperationsOverviewThe Department of Defense (DOD) defines cyberspace as a global domain within the information environment consisting of the interdependent network of information technology infrastructures and resident data, including the Internet, telecommunications networks, computer systems, and embedded processors and controllers. The DOD Information Network (DODIN) is a global infrastructure carrying DOD, national security, and related intelligence community information and intelligence.Cyberspace operations are composed of the military, intelligence, and ordinary business operations of the DOD in and through cyberspace. Military cyberspace operations use cyberspace capabilities to create effects that support operations across the physical domains and cyberspace. Cyberspace operations differ from information operations (IO), which are specifically concerned with the use of information-related capabilities during military operations to affect the decision making of adversaries while protecting our own. IO may use cyberspace as a medium, but it may also employ capabilities from the physical domains.Cyberspace operations are categorized into the following: Offensive Cyberspace Operations, intended to project power by the application of force in and through cyberspace. These operations are authorized like operations in the physical domains. Defensive Cyberspace Operations, to defend DOD or other friendly cyberspace. These are both passive and active defense operations and are conducted inside and outside of DODIN. DODIN Operations, to design, build, configure, secure, operate, maintain, and sustain DOD communications systems and networks across the entire DODIN.Cyber StrategyIn September 2018, the White House released a national cyber strategy consisting of four pillars: (1) protecting the American people, homeland, and way of life by safeguarding networks systems, functions and data; (2) promoting prosperity by nurturing a secure, thriving digital economy and fostering strong domestic innovation; (3) preserving peace and security by strengthening the ability of the United States, its partners, and allies to deter and punish those who use cyber maliciously; and (4) advancing influence to extend the key tenets of an open, interoperable, reliable, and secure internet.Following these pillars, DOD released its own cyber strategy outlining five lines of effort: (1) build a more lethalforce; (2) compete and deter in cyberspace; (3) strengthen alliances and attract new partnerships; (4) reform the department; and (5) cultivate talent.Three operational concepts identified in the DOD Cyber Strategy are to conduct cyberspace operations to collect intelligence and prepare military cyber capabilities to be used in the event of crisis or conflict, and to defend forward to disrupt or halt malicious cyber activity at its source, including activity that falls below the level of armed conflict. Defending forward may involve a more aggressive active defense, meaning activities designed to disrupt an adversary’s network when hostile activity is suspected.Cyber Mission ForceDOD began to build a National Cyber Mission Force (NCMF) in 2012 to carry out DOD’s cyber missions. The NCMF consists of 133 teams that are organized to meet DOD’s three cyber missions. Specifically, National Cyber Mission Force teams support these mission sets though their respective assignments: Cyber National Mission Teams defend the nation by seeing adversary activity, blocking attacks, and maneuvering in cyberspace to defeat them. Cyber Combat Mission Teams conduct military cyber operations in support of combatant commands. Cyber Protection Teams defend the DOD information networks, protect priority missions, and prepare cyber forces for combat. Cyber Support Teams provide analytic and planning support to National Mission and Combat Mission teams.NCMF teams reached full operational capacity at over 6,200 individuals in May 2018. Organizationally, the National Cyber Mission Force is an entity of the United States Cyber Command.United States Cyber CommandIn response to the growing cyber threat, in 2009 the Secretary of Defense directed the establishment of a new military command devoted to cyber activities. USCYBERCOM’s stated mission is to “direct the operations and defense of specified Department of Defense information networks and; prepare to, and when directed, conduct full spectrum military cyberspace operations in order to enable actions in all domains, ensure US/Allied freedom of action in cyberspace and deny the same to our adversaries.” Elevated to a unified combatant command in May 2018, USCYBERCOM is commanded by a four-star general, who is also the director of the National Security Agency and chief of the Central Security Service. Thehttps://crsreports.congress.govUpdated January 14, 2020commander manages day-to-day global cyberspace operations and leads defense and protection of DODIN. Each of the military services provides support to USCYBERCOM.Some services are currently reorganizing their Cyber Commands into Information Warfare Commands.Other Defense ComponentsOther entities within the DOD and the IC are tasked with a supporting or collaborative role in cyberspace operations.National Security AgencyThe National Security Agency (NSA) works closely with USCYBERCOM. NSA’s two primary missions are information assurance for national security systems and signals intelligence. USCYBERCOM is co-located with the NSA at Fort Meade, MD.Defense Information Systems AgencyThe mission of the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) is to provide and ensure command and control and information-sharing capabilities and a globally accessible enterprise information infrastructure in direct support to joint warfighters across the full spectrum of military operations. The Director of DISA is responsible for the remediation of critical DODIN infrastructure issues.Federal RoleThe Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is the lead federal department for critical infrastructure protection and nonmilitary federal cybersecurity. DOD is responsible for supporting the DHS coordination of efforts to protect the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) and the DODIN portion of the DIB. Together, the two are charged with defending the U.S. homeland and U.S. national interests against cyberattacks of significant consequence. Military cyber assets may be deployed in the event of a major cyberattack on U.S. critical infrastructure only when directed to do so.AuthoritiesSection 954 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2012 affirms that “the Department of Defense has the capability, and upon direction by the President may conduct offensive operations in cyberspace to defend our Nation, Allies and interests, subject to the policy principles and legal regimes that the Department follows for kinetic capabilities, including the law of armed conflict and the War Powers Resolution.” Section 1632 of the FY 2019 NDAA affirms that DOD may conduct operations in cyberspace, including clandestine operations, short of hostilities or in areas in which hostilities are not occurring; it also states that a clandestine military activity or operation in cyberspace shall be considered a traditional military activity (TMA). Section 1642 of the FY 2019NDAA provides authority for DOD “to take appropriate and proportional action in foreign cyberspace to disrupt, defeat, and deter” in response to “an active, systematic, and ongoing campaign of attacks against the Government or people of the United States in cyberspace, including attempting to influence American elections and democratic political processes.”Under Title 50, a “covert action” is subject to a presidential finding and Intelligence Committee notification requirements. 50 U.S.C. 3093 allows the President to authorize the conduct of a covert action if he determines such an action is necessary to support identifiable foreign policy objectives of the United States and is important to the U.S. national security, which determination shall be set forth in a finding that shall be in writing, unless immediate action is required. TMAs are excepted from this requirement. The FY2018 NDAA required notification of the use of cyber weapons and quarterly cyber operations briefings to the congressional Armed Services Committees.The Obama Administration’s classified Presidential Policy Directive 20 governed U.S. cyber operations policy, but it did not grant new authorities. According to the former officials, the document required interagency approval for significant cyber operations. In September 2018, the White House acknowledged replacing it with new guidance, National Security Presidential Memorandum 13, which is said to offer more authority to the commander of USCYBERCOM.Law of Armed Conflict in CyberspaceThe law of war regulates the conduct of armed hostilities. It encompasses all international law binding on the United States, including treaties and international agreements to which the United States is a party, and applicable customary international law. DOD policy states that the fundamental principles of the law of war will apply to cyberspace operations.Defense Primer: Cyberspace OperationsMilitary Service ComponentsArmy Cyber Command: 2nd Army (ARCY)Air Forces Cyber Command: 24th Air Force (AFCY) Navy Fleet Cyber Command: 10th Fleet (FLTCY)Marine Corps Forces Cyberspace Command: MAR4CYRelevant StatutesTitle 50, U.S. Code, War and National Defense, Section 3093: Secure US interests by conducting military and foreign intelligence operations in cyberspace.CRS ProductsCRS Report R43955, Cyberwarfare and Cyberterrorism: In Brief, by Catherine A. Theohary and John W. RollinsOther ResourcesDOD. Joint Publication 3-12, Cyberspace Operations, February 5, 2013.DOD. The Department of Defense Cyber Strategy, September 2018.https://crsreports.congress.govCatherine A. Theohary, Specialist in National Security Policy and Information OperationsDefense Primer: Cyberspace OperationsIF10537DisclaimerThis document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10537 · VERSION 4 · UPDATED

DEFENSE CYBER PHYSIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. (AI SOFTWARE)

fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/IF10537.pdf DEFENSE CYBER PHYSIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. (AI SOFTWARE) Defense Primer: Cyberspace Operations Overview The Department of Defense (DOD) defines cyberspace as a global domain within the information environment consisting of the interdependent network of information technology infrastructures and resident data, including the Internet, telecommunications networks, computer systems, and embedded processors and controllers. The DOD Information NetworkContinue reading “DEFENSE CYBER PHYSIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. (AI SOFTWARE)”

Magnus Olsson- Cyber-Torture (MILITARY & INTELLIGENCE) ELECTRONIC CONCENTRATION CAMP/ ELECTRONIC WARFARE), (ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX PARTNERS ) on the way to The United Nations General As.. ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX MILITARY. AEROSPACE INTELLIGENCE. COMPUTER AGENCIES PARTNERS LIST ARE CONDUCTING BRAIN & BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION RESEARCH in ILLINOIShttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHwIJjxOAlQ&feature=share

Magnus Olsson- Cyber-Torture (MILITARY & INTELLIGENCE) ELECTRONIC CONCENTRATION CAMP/ ELECTRONIC WARFARE), on the way to The United Nations General As… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHwIJjxOAlQ&feature=share

http://www.youtube.com/watch

https://youtu.be/oNr0BAmQ6BETARGETED INDIVIDUALS PROGRAM ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX “DEEP STATE “ PARTNERS.Midge Mathis + Ella Free Two Icons Together 2020 07 29 2059https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNr0BAmQ6BE&feature=share

https://youtu.be/oNr0BAmQ6BE TARGETED INDIVIDUALS PROGRAM ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX “DEEP STATE “ PARTNERS. Midge Mathis + Ella Free Two Icons Together 2020 07 29 2059 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNr0BAmQ6BE&feature=share

http://www.youtube.com/watch

MILITARY INDUSTRIAL CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS. ILLINOIS HAS ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX PARTNERS. Magnus Olsson- Cyber-Torture on the way to The United Nations General As…https://youtu.be/HHwIJjxOAlQ

UNIVERSITIES CONDUCTING RESEARCH ON BEHALF OF DEFENSE. UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS URBANA CHAMPAIGN. UNIVERSITY CHICAGO. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY. ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY. FERMILAB. TEXAS. CALIFORNIA BRAIN RESEARCH . ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX PARTNERS LIST OF UNIVERSITIES. MEDICAL. BIO MEDICAL. MILITARY. MILITARY CONTRACTORS. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LABORATORIES. TIs- ASN Shows you are a Test Subject For Neuro Research Screen Recordin…https://youtu.be/2nQqCJKeMMUMs. Adams

All TI’s need to see this, please spread the wordhttps://youtu.be/Y_wZwwZ0DGQTRACK RF BY MILITARY, UNIVERSITIES, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT , MILITARY CONTRACTORS FOR CYBERNETICS. (ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX PARTNERS LIST. https://youtu.be/Y_wZwwZ0DGQ

MELINDA KIDDER REPORT. SUMMATION AND RECOMMENDATIONSAll things are made up of atoms. Atoms emit ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Atoms in the human body emit non-ionizing radiation which can be detected as electromagnetic frequency or EMF. Normal measurements of EMF from the human body are typically 0.00-0.01μT. Dunlop’s evaluation for EMF revealed higher levels of EMF emissions from his body. Dunlop stated that he has never consented and never authorized any medical experiments or programs which would allow for implantation or ingestion of devices or materials which cause increased EMF emissions from the human body.Based on the evaluations, the points of concern for Dunlop’s assessment are that his EMF readings are abnormal and there were ambient RF which were not present prior to or after his visit. In addition, his eyes reflected various hues under UV lighting and black spider lines were evident on his body under infrared inspection. These assessment results might be indicative of substances having been introduced to Dunlop’s body without his consent, as well as non-consensual monitoring.If Dunlop chooses to undergo further testing, I would recommend these locations, frequencies and issues as focal points based on the observations contained within this report.The above statements are true and accurate to the best of my recollection.http://www.derekjamesdunlop.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/RFID-Microchip-Verification-Nanomaterials.pdf

SUMMATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS All things are made up of atoms. Atoms emit ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Atoms in the human body emit non-ionizing radiation which can be detected as electromagnetic frequency or EMF. Normal measurements of EMF from the human body are typically 0.00-0.01μT. Dunlop’s evaluation for EMF revealed higher levels of EMF emissions from his body. Dunlop stated that he has never consented and never authorized any medical experiments or programs which would allow for implantation or ingestion of devices or materials which cause increased EMF emissions from the human body. Based on the evaluations, the points of concern for Dunlop’s assessment are that his EMF readings are abnormal and there were ambient RF which were not present prior to or after his visit. In addition, his eyes reflected various hues under UV lighting and black spider lines were evident on his body under infrared inspection. These assessment results might be indicative of substances having been introduced to Dunlop’s body without his consent, as well as non-consensual monitoring. If Dunlop chooses to undergo further testing, I would recommend these locations, frequencies and issues as focal points based on the observations contained within this report. The above statements are true and accurate to the best of my recollection. http://www.derekjamesdunlop.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/RFID-Microchip-Verification-Nanomaterials.pdf

http://www.derekjamesdunlop.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/RFID-Microchip-Verification-Nanomaterials.pdf

ARGONNE AIR FORCE

Argonne Air Force Fellows | Argonne National Laboratoryhttps://www.anl.gov/nsp/argonne-air-force-fellows Argonne National Laboratory SEARCHNATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS Argonne Air Force Fellows  NSP Menu NSP About NSPOPEN SUBLIST Leadership Air Force Fellows Mission AreasOPEN SUBLIST ResearchOPEN SUBLIST News SHARE Promoting communication between the Air Force and Argonne, encouraging collaborations that benefit the departments of Energy and Defense. Each year,Continue reading “ARGONNE AIR FORCE”

ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM

About Us | Argonne National Laboratoryhttps://www.anl.gov/nsp/about-us National Security Programs serves as a gateway for government sponsors and contractors to link into tailored, diverse teams of elite researchers with access to advanced, on-campus user facilities (such as the Advanced Photo Source and the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility) to solve pressing national security issues. Born out ofContinue reading “ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM”

ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM WITH AIRFORCE

National Security Programs | Argonne National Laboratoryhttps://www.anl.gov/nsp Argonne National Laboratory SEARCH National Security Programs NSP NSP Menu NSP About NSPOPEN SUBLIST Mission AreasOPEN SUBLIST ResearchOPEN SUBLIST News SHARE The laboratory’s National Security Programs serves as a gateway for government sponsors and contractors to link into tailored, diverse teams of elite researchers to solve R&D challenges inContinue reading “ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM WITH AIRFORCE”

ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH PROGRAM AREAS OF FOCUS.

Areas of Focus | Argonne National Laboratory  NATIONAL SECURITY  RESEARCH PROGRAMShttps://www.anl.gov/nsp/areas-of-focus RESEARCH AREA Advanced Materials and Manufacturing  The careful examination, study and manufacturing of materials underlies the impressive innovations that make up modern life. RESEARCH AREA Biosecurity Biological threats, whether naturally occurring or manmade, have the power to disrupt and cause catastrophic harm to human populations.RESEARCHContinue reading “ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH PROGRAM AREAS OF FOCUS.”

ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY OF LEMONT ILLINOIS BIOSCIENCES RESEARCH RESEARCH DIVISION.

About Us | Argonne National Laboratory https://www.anl.gov/bio/about-us Research projects in Argonne’s Biosciences Division range from fundamental studies of genome sequences using molecular biology and computational strategies as well as experimental validation of protein structure/function to detailed analysis of field samples for the characterization of natural biochemical processes at the molecular level. The mission of theContinue reading “ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY OF LEMONT ILLINOIS BIOSCIENCES RESEARCH RESEARCH DIVISION.”

ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY ILLINOIS. UNIVERSITY CHICAGO. UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS. FERMILAB NATIONAL LABORATORY. ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE DEFENSE & AEROSPACE PARTNERS. ILLINOIS POLITICIANS.

Kasthuri testifies before House Energy-Water Appropriations Subcommittee | Argonne National Laboratory https://www.anl.gov/bio/article/kasthuri-testifies-before-house-energywater-appropriations-subcommittee Kasthuri testifies before House Energy-Water Appropriations Subcommittee BIO Menu • BIO Division • About BIOOPEN SUBLIST • • • • ResearchOPEN SUBLIST • • • • • News • Publications SHARE •    BY BRIAN GRABOWSKI|FEBRUARY 5, 2020 Argonne’s first neuroscientist describes how improved agencyContinue reading “ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY ILLINOIS. UNIVERSITY CHICAGO. UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS. FERMILAB NATIONAL LABORATORY. ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE DEFENSE & AEROSPACE PARTNERS. ILLINOIS POLITICIANS.”

Written Testimony of Dr. Narayanan (Bobby) KasthuriNeuroscientist, Argonne National Laboratory, andAssistant Professor of Neurobiology, University of Chicagobefore theCommittee on Science, Space, and Technology, Subcommittee on Energy and Subcommittee on Research and Technology, of the U.S. House of Representatives

Written Testimony of Dr. Narayanan (Bobby) KasthuriNeuroscientist, Argonne National Laboratory, andAssistant Professor of Neurobiology, University of Chicagobefore theCommittee on Science, Space, and Technology, Subcommittee on Energy and Subcommittee on Research and Technology, of the U.S. House of RepresentativesJuly 12th, 2018SUMMARY• We stand at a pivotal moment in our centuries-long quest to understand the brain—the momentContinue reading “Written Testimony of Dr. Narayanan (Bobby) KasthuriNeuroscientist, Argonne National Laboratory, andAssistant Professor of Neurobiology, University of Chicagobefore theCommittee on Science, Space, and Technology, Subcommittee on Energy and Subcommittee on Research and Technology, of the U.S. House of Representatives”

WE CAN NO LONGER AFFORD THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX

We Can No Longer Afford the Military-Industrial Complexhttps://www.thenation.com/article/politics/house-senate-defense-spending/ We Can No Longer Afford the Military-Industrial Complex 93 members of the House and 23 Senators just voted to cut the Pentagon budget. That’s a historic call for new priorities. Now, Democrats must amplify it. By John NicholsTwitter JULY 22, 2020 Facebook Twitter Email Representative Barbara Lee atContinue reading “WE CAN NO LONGER AFFORD THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX”

We Can No Longer Afford the Military-Industrial Complex

We Can No Longer Afford the Military-Industrial Complex 93 members of the House and 23 Senators just voted to cut the Pentagon budget. That’s a historic call for new priorities. Now, Democrats must amplify it. By John NicholsTwitter JULY 22, 2020 Facebook Twitter Email Representative Barbara Lee at the House Committee on Appropriations Markup ofContinue reading “We Can No Longer Afford the Military-Industrial Complex”

Ella & Liliana De Lucca: JOIN US – WORLD AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, 7/31 (see info box for details) – YouTubeElla & Liliana De Lucca: JOIN US – WORLD AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, 7/31 (see info box for details) – YouTube— Read on www.youtube.com/embed/JlkbVJjFsacElla & Liliana De Lucca: JOIN US – WORLD AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, 7/32 (see info box for details)

Ella & Liliana De Lucca: JOIN US – WORLD AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, 7/31 (see info box for details) – YouTube Ella & Liliana De Lucca: JOIN US – WORLD AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, 7/31 (see info box for details) – YouTube — Read on www.youtube.com/embed/JlkbVJjFsac Ella & Liliana De Lucca: JOIN US – WORLD AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, 7/32 (see info box for details)

Ella & Liliana De Lucca: JOIN US – WORLD AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, 7/31 (see info box for details) – YouTube Ella & Liliana De Lucca: JOIN US – WORLD AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, 7/31 (see info box for details) – YouTube — Read on http://www.youtube.com/embed/JlkbVJjFsac

AI SUPER QUANTUM BIOLOGICAL COMPUTERS

WARNING: Anthony Patch – CERN Will Resurrect NIMROD and His Band of Neph… 2019 Chicago Quantum Summit  The second annual Chicago Quantum Summit, hosted at the University of Chicago, will engage scientific and government leaders from around the globe and the industries that will drive the applications of emerging quantum information science research. WithContinue reading “AI SUPER QUANTUM BIOLOGICAL COMPUTERS”

SUPER BIOLOGICAL QUANTUM COMPUTERS. AI

WARNING: Anthony Patch – CERN Will Resurrect NIMROD and His Band of Neph… Large Hadron Collider Large Hadron Collider | University of Chicago News University of Chicago to build instrumentation for upgrades to the Large Hadron Collider  Feb 13, 2020 Scientists invent way to trap mysterious ‘dark world’ particle at Large Hadron Collider Apr 17,Continue reading “SUPER BIOLOGICAL QUANTUM COMPUTERS. AI”

UNIVERSITY CHICAGO LARGE HADRON COLLIDER.

WARNING: Anthony Patch – CERN Will Resurrect NIMROD and His Band of Neph… Large Hadron Collider Large Hadron Collider | University of Chicago News University of Chicago to build instrumentation for upgrades to the Large Hadron Collider  Feb 13, 2020 Scientists invent way to trap mysterious ‘dark world’ particle at Large Hadron Collider Apr 17,Continue reading “UNIVERSITY CHICAGO LARGE HADRON COLLIDER.”

WARNING: Anthony Patch – CERN Will Resurrect NIMROD and His Band of Neph… https://youtu.be/LyVK0Vp0rNo Large Hadron Collider University of Chicago to build instrumentation for upgrades to the Large Hadron Collider Feb 13, 2020 Scientists invent way to trap mysterious ‘dark world’ particle at Large Hadron Collider Apr 17, 2019 UChicago computational researchers join quest to search beyond the Higgs boson Sep 4, 2018 Scientists detect most common way that Higgs bosons decay Aug 28, 2018 After Higgs discovery, what’s next? Aug 9, 2016 UChicago The Particle That Wasn’t Aug 8, 2016 NYT Computation Institute scientists create new analytics platform for ATLAS experiment Mar 7, 2016 ‘Particle Fever’ screening and discussion on Aug. 26 to feature film’s star scientist Aug 12, 2014 UChicago to host experts for panel on the Higgs boson particle discovery Jan 28, 2013 Physicists’ search for Higgs boson reveals new particle with very large mass Jul 4, 2012 1 2 Next ›

http://www.youtube.com/watch

Vault 7 – Wikipedia

Language Watch Edit Official Publishing Logo for documents collectively labeled Vault 7. Vault 7 is a series of documents that WikiLeaks began to publish on 7 March 2017, that detail activities and capabilities of the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency to perform electronic surveillance and cyber warfare. The files, dated from 2013–2016, include details onContinue reading “Vault 7 – Wikipedia”

Feds file criminal case against ComEd, implicate House Speaker Mike Madigan – Chicago Sun-Times

Follow Chicago Sun-Times online: Log In Try 1 month for $1 Chicago Sun-Times main menu News Coronavirus More FILED UNDER: POLITICS NEWS METRO/STATE Feds file criminal case against ComEd, implicate Mike Madigan A federal subpoena to Madigan’s office shows the feds are interested in the speaker’s relationship with other companies as well. The feds alsoContinue reading “Feds file criminal case against ComEd, implicate House Speaker Mike Madigan – Chicago Sun-Times”

UNIVERSITIES AND MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX. UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS URBANA CHAMPAIGN FOR ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE INTERNET OF THINGS. Elana Freeland (03-19-19) The Space Fence https://youtu.be/KAwNb3IklLU

http://www.youtube.com/watch

MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX MK ULTRA MIND CONTROL PROGRAM. ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX. PART 1. Sage of Quay Radio – Elisa E. with Elana Freeland – Our Life Beyond MKUL..https://youtu.be/aPJBW-9Iyk8PART 2. Sage of Quay Radio – Elisa E. with Elana Freeland – MKUltra and Unseen F…https://youtu.be/oK1DSkSl0xw

PART 1. Sage of Quay Radio – Elisa E. with Elana Freeland – Our Life Beyond MKUL.. https://youtu.be/aPJBW-9Iyk8 PART 2. Sage of Quay Radio – Elisa E. with Elana Freeland – MKUltra and Unseen F… https://youtu.be/oK1DSkSl0xw

http://www.youtube.com/watch

MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY VIOLATING HUMAN & CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. FREQUENCY WAVES, SCHUMANN RESONANCE (EARH BIOFIELD ENERGY) with HUMAN BIOFIELD ENERGY 7.83 HZ; REMOTE NEURAL MONITORING AND VOICE TO SKULL V2K (VOICE OF god WEAPON) used in Iraq war. USES SATELLITE HUMAN to MACHINE (HMI) or BRAIN to MACHINE (BMI) AI TECHNOLOGY. TARGETS THE HUMAN BRAIN, HEART, ORGANS, MEASURES BODILY FLUIDS AND CIRCUITS (BIOMETRICS) SURVEILLANCE. THIS IS THE ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX PARTNERS LIST WHICH INCLUDES DARPA, MILITARY CONTRACTORS, MILITARY, CIA, PIBLIC & PRIVATE CORPORATIONS, RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES AND THEIR LABS AND HOSPITALS, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LABORATORIES, and BIOELECTRONIC MEDICINE CALLED ELECTRX.Podcast: Tonight Lance Johnson TI RNM V2K 2020 06 29 205956https://youtu.be/fsbnckpsETY

MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY VIOLATING HUMAN & CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. FREQUENCY WAVES, SCHUMANN RESONANCE (EARH BIOFIELD ENERGY) with HUMAN BIOFIELD ENERGY 7.83 HZ; REMOTE NEURAL MONITORING AND VOICE TO SKULL V2K (VOICE OF god WEAPON) used in Iraq war. USES SATELLITE HUMAN to MACHINE (HMI) or BRAIN to MACHINE (BMI) AI TECHNOLOGY. TARGETS THE HUMAN BRAIN, HEART, ORGANS, MEASURES BODILY FLUIDS AND CIRCUITS (BIOMETRICS) SURVEILLANCE. Tonight Lance Johnson TI RNM V2K 2020 06 29 205956 https://youtu.be/fsbnckpsETY

http://www.youtube.com/watch

DARPA ELECTRICAL PRESCRIPTIONS CALLED ELECTRX. FLU SHOT GIVEN AT THE KANKAKEE COUNTY FCRC.https://www.darpa.mil/program/electrical-prescriptionsDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyProgram InformationElectrical Prescriptions (ElectRx)Dr. Eric Van GiesonThe Electrical Prescriptions (ElectRx) program aims to support military operational readiness by reducing the time to treatment, logistical challenges, and potential off-target effects associated with traditional medical interventions for a wide range of physical and mental health conditions commonly faced by our warfighters. ElectRx seeks to deliver non-pharmacological treatments for pain, general inflammation, post-traumatic stress, severe anxiety, and trauma that employ precise, closed-loop, non-invasive modulation of the patient’s peripheral nervous system.The human nervous system already plays a vital role in maintaining all aspects of physical and mental health. A sophisticated network of sensory nerves continuously monitors health status and triggers reflexive responses in the brain and spinal cord when an infection or injury is detected. These reflexes normally adjust organ function to initiate and control the healing process. However, some diseases can disrupt healthy functioning of these processes and produce nerve signaling that causes pain, metabolic disorders such as diabetes, and autoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. ElectRx technology would exploit and supplement the body’s natural ability to quickly and effectively heal itself, intervening when required to correct or bolster nervous system activity.ElectRx is establishing the underlying science and developing the technologies that could enable artificial modulation of peripheral nerves to restore healthy patterns of signaling in these neural circuits. The program seeks to advance understanding of the anatomy and physiology of specific neural circuits and their role in health and disease. In parallel, the program also seeks to develop novel biological-interface technologies for monitoring biomarkers and peripheral nerve activity, and delivering therapeutic signals to peripheral nerve targets. Potential new approaches include in vivo, real-time biosensors and novel neural interfaces using optical, acoustic, electromagnetic, or engineered biology strategies to achieve precise targeting with potentially single-axon resolution.Following successes in early proof-of-concept studies, the ElectRx devices and therapeutic systems under development are entering into clinical studies. If successful, such precise neuromodulation capability technology would reduce dependence on traditional drugs and create new treatments that could be automatically and continuously tuned to the needs of warfighters without side effects. The technology could also help doctors evaluate and predict various physiological states, and characterize host response in patients with severe infections, providing a quantitative framework to guide operations and therapy.TAGS| Health | Injury | Med-Devices | Neuroscience |Restoration |New Generation of Intelligent Bio-Interfaces Could Overcome Aspects of Spinal Cord InjuryWork Begins to Support Self-Healing of Body and MindHAPTIX Starts Work to Provide Prosthetic Hands with Sense of TouchHand Proprioception and Touch InterfacesProgress in Quest to Develop a Human Memory Prosthesis

DARPA ELECTRICAL PRESCRIPTIONS CALLED ELECTRX. FLU SHOT GIVEN AT THE KANKAKEE COUNTY FCRC. https://www.darpa.mil/program/electrical-prescriptions Defense Advanced Research Projects AgencyProgram Information Electrical Prescriptions (ElectRx) Dr. Eric Van Gieson The Electrical Prescriptions (ElectRx) program aims to support military operational readiness by reducing the time to treatment, logistical challenges, and potential off-target effects associated with traditional medical interventions for a wide range of physical and mental health conditions commonly faced by our warfighters. ElectRx seeks to deliver non-pharmacological treatments for pain, general inflammation, post-traumatic stress, severe anxiety, and trauma that employ precise, closed-loop, non-invasive modulation of the patient’s peripheral nervous system. The human nervous system already plays a vital role in maintaining all aspects of physical and mental health. A sophisticated network of sensory nerves continuously monitors health status and triggers reflexive responses in the brain and spinal cord when an infection or injury is detected. These reflexes normally adjust organ function to initiate and control the healing process. However, some diseases can disrupt healthy functioning of these processes and produce nerve signaling that causes pain, metabolic disorders such as diabetes, and autoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. ElectRx technology would exploit and supplement the body’s natural ability to quickly and effectively heal itself, intervening when required to correct or bolster nervous system activity. ElectRx is establishing the underlying science and developing the technologies that could enable artificial modulation of peripheral nerves to restore healthy patterns of signaling in these neural circuits. The program seeks to advance understanding of the anatomy and physiology of specific neural circuits and their role in health and disease. In parallel, the program also seeks to develop novel biological-interface technologies for monitoring biomarkers and peripheral nerve activity, and delivering therapeutic signals to peripheral nerve targets. Potential new approaches include in vivo, real-time biosensors and novel neural interfaces using optical, acoustic, electromagnetic, or engineered biology strategies to achieve precise targeting with potentially single-axon resolution. Following successes in early proof-of-concept studies, the ElectRx devices and therapeutic systems under development are entering into clinical studies. If successful, such precise neuromodulation capability technology would reduce dependence on traditional drugs and create new treatments that could be automatically and continuously tuned to the needs of warfighters without side effects. The technology could also help doctors evaluate and predict various physiological states, and characterize host response in patients with severe infections, providing a quantitative framework to guide operations and therapy. TAGS | Health | Injury | Med-Devices | Neuroscience |Restoration | New Generation of Intelligent Bio-Interfaces Could Overcome Aspects of Spinal Cord Injury Work Begins to Support Self-Healing of Body and Mind HAPTIX Starts Work to Provide Prosthetic Hands with Sense of Touch Hand Proprioception and Touch Interfaces Progress in Quest to Develop a Human Memory Prosthesis

MAIN MENUEXPLORE BY TAG Defense Advanced Research Projects AgencyProgram Information Electrical Prescriptions (ElectRx) Dr. Eric Van Gieson The Electrical Prescriptions (ElectRx) program aims to support military operational readiness by reducing the time to treatment, logistical challenges, and potential off-target effects associated with traditional medical interventions for a wide range of physical and mental health conditionsContinue reading “DARPA ELECTRICAL PRESCRIPTIONS CALLED ELECTRX. FLU SHOT GIVEN AT THE KANKAKEE COUNTY FCRC. https://www.darpa.mil/program/electrical-prescriptions Defense Advanced Research Projects AgencyProgram Information Electrical Prescriptions (ElectRx) Dr. Eric Van Gieson The Electrical Prescriptions (ElectRx) program aims to support military operational readiness by reducing the time to treatment, logistical challenges, and potential off-target effects associated with traditional medical interventions for a wide range of physical and mental health conditions commonly faced by our warfighters. ElectRx seeks to deliver non-pharmacological treatments for pain, general inflammation, post-traumatic stress, severe anxiety, and trauma that employ precise, closed-loop, non-invasive modulation of the patient’s peripheral nervous system. The human nervous system already plays a vital role in maintaining all aspects of physical and mental health. A sophisticated network of sensory nerves continuously monitors health status and triggers reflexive responses in the brain and spinal cord when an infection or injury is detected. These reflexes normally adjust organ function to initiate and control the healing process. However, some diseases can disrupt healthy functioning of these processes and produce nerve signaling that causes pain, metabolic disorders such as diabetes, and autoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. ElectRx technology would exploit and supplement the body’s natural ability to quickly and effectively heal itself, intervening when required to correct or bolster nervous system activity. ElectRx is establishing the underlying science and developing the technologies that could enable artificial modulation of peripheral nerves to restore healthy patterns of signaling in these neural circuits. The program seeks to advance understanding of the anatomy and physiology of specific neural circuits and their role in health and disease. In parallel, the program also seeks to develop novel biological-interface technologies for monitoring biomarkers and peripheral nerve activity, and delivering therapeutic signals to peripheral nerve targets. Potential new approaches include in vivo, real-time biosensors and novel neural interfaces using optical, acoustic, electromagnetic, or engineered biology strategies to achieve precise targeting with potentially single-axon resolution. Following successes in early proof-of-concept studies, the ElectRx devices and therapeutic systems under development are entering into clinical studies. If successful, such precise neuromodulation capability technology would reduce dependence on traditional drugs and create new treatments that could be automatically and continuously tuned to the needs of warfighters without side effects. The technology could also help doctors evaluate and predict various physiological states, and characterize host response in patients with severe infections, providing a quantitative framework to guide operations and therapy. TAGS | Health | Injury | Med-Devices | Neuroscience |Restoration | New Generation of Intelligent Bio-Interfaces Could Overcome Aspects of Spinal Cord Injury Work Begins to Support Self-Healing of Body and Mind HAPTIX Starts Work to Provide Prosthetic Hands with Sense of Touch Hand Proprioception and Touch Interfaces Progress in Quest to Develop a Human Memory Prosthesis”

Military Helicopters Descend over Central Texas for Mass Civil Unrest Drill. Black helicopters and small commercial planes flying throughout kankakee county and throughout Illinois. https://youtu.be/Emm16psE0OA

http://www.youtube.com/watch

SMARTCITY/SMARTSTATE CITIES. ILLINOIS IS THE FIRST US SMARTSTATE CALLED ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE BLOCKCHAIN INITIATIVE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX Agenda 21 Smart Cities: Orwell’s Dystopic Nightmare Comes True https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9DK0JThOio&feature=share

http://www.youtube.com/watch

NUCLEAR UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGIES of ENGINEERING PHYSICS for BIO-MEDICINE. (NANOTECHNOLOGY)

https://eng.mephi.ru/research/strategic-academic-units/physbio NUCLEAR UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGIES of ENGINEERING PHYSICS for BIO-MEDICINE. (NANOTECHNOLOGY) Strategic goal: Achievement of leading positions in the development of technologies of engineering physics for biomedicine and their active employment in the educational process in order to bridge the gap between scientific research, education, device manufacturing and practical medicine. Structure: • Faculty of Medicine •Continue reading “NUCLEAR UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGIES of ENGINEERING PHYSICS for BIO-MEDICINE. (NANOTECHNOLOGY)”

Scientists research effects of infrasonic vibrations in humansOctober 12, 2016 , National Research Nuclear UniversityBLOOD FREQUENCY RESONANCE. Scientists research effects of infrasonic vibrations in humansOctober 12, 2016 , National Research Nuclear UniversityIt is known that the human body can generate mechanical vibrations at very low frequencies, so-called infrasonic waves. Such low-frequency vibrations are produced by physiological processes—heartbeats, respiratory movements, blood flow in vessels, and other processes. Different organs of the human body produce different resonance frequencies. The heart resonance frequency is ~ 1 hz. The brain has a resonance frequency of ~ 10 hz, blood circulation about 0.05 to 0.3 hz.Scientists from the National Research Nuclear University and collaborators have used a highly sensitive laser device to register infrasonic vibrations in human body. “We tried to find out factors, influencing amplitude-frequency characteristics of such vibrations,” says researcher Olga Molchanova.The scientists discovered that the observed vibrations are connected with the cardiovascular system, which has its own proper movements occurring simultaneously with the work of the heart. Three types of infrasonic vibrations were registered. Waves of the first type are connected with the heartbeat; the second with the human respiratory rhythm; the third, called Traube-Hering waves, with states of emotional tension. Thus, it could be possible to judge the human emotional state via the amplitude frequency response of these waves.Stemming the blood flow along vessels using a tourniquet applied to the wrist changes the intensity of laser radiation through tissues, which is connected with the stoppage of blood inflow into vessels. This effect is observed due to the lowering of tissue enrichment by oxygen, which absorbs radiation in the nearest infrared region. An opposite effect was observed when subjects held their breath—the intensity of the laser radiation through tissues lowered. It might be connected with the fact that while holding the breath, blood is saturated with hemoglobin, which leads to the increase of laser radiation absorption and the decrease of the signal. These results could be important for non-invasive medical diagnostics. https://phys.org/news/2016-10-scientists-effects-infrasonic-vibrations-humans.html

DoD/DoJ Joint Program Steering Group (JPSG) Reports, 1994-Present (Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense) • MuckRock

MuckRock is a collaborative news site that gives you the tools to hold the government accountable. — Read on http://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/doddoj-joint-program-steering-group-jpsg-reports-1994-present-department-of-defense-office-of-the-secretary-of-defense-47508/

Thread by @EccEveryday: ” Remember, no-one in the world can be harmed, can have their basic human rights, their civil rights, natural rights re […]” #DisclosureOnTargeting #HardlyAmerican #Secrecy #Quantico

#DisclosureOnTargeting Remember, no-one in the world can be harmed, can have their basic human rights, their civil rights, natural rights removed from them without a group of absolute MERCENARIES ensconced in govt. ACTIVELY CONSPIRING to make $$$ off their bodies. #HardlyAmerican 2/ That kind of hubris well-shielded by #Secrecy cd. grow only in Secrecy. Wd.Continue reading “Thread by @EccEveryday: ” Remember, no-one in the world can be harmed, can have their basic human rights, their civil rights, natural rights re […]” #DisclosureOnTargeting #HardlyAmerican #Secrecy #Quantico”

Thread by @EccEveryday: ” Remember, no-one in the world can be harmed, can have their basic human rights, their civil rights, natural rights re […]” #DisclosureOnTargeting #HardlyAmerican #Secrecy #Quantico

#DisclosureOnTargeting Remember, no-one in the world can be harmed, can have their basic human rights, their civil rights, natural rights removed from them without a group of absolute MERCENARIES ensconced in govt. ACTIVELY CONSPIRING to make $$$ off their bodies. #HardlyAmerican 2/ That kind of hubris well-shielded by #Secrecy cd. grow only in Secrecy. Wd.Continue reading “Thread by @EccEveryday: ” Remember, no-one in the world can be harmed, can have their basic human rights, their civil rights, natural rights re […]” #DisclosureOnTargeting #HardlyAmerican #Secrecy #Quantico”

Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996 | The EveryDay Concerned Citizen

rds of Governors, Doctors, Police, and Ministers Must Be Held AccountableMajor Exposé & Impending Breakthrough for Millions as UK Council & Police Crimes of House, Property, Child Theft Via Court Order Scams Are Revealed As Such by Honest Court Manager → Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans SeriesContinue reading “Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996 | The EveryDay Concerned Citizen”

#Cybertorture finally named & recognized by UN Special Raporteur, Nils Melzer. This is what we the victims of technopsychopaths at the 80 Fusion Centers across the USA are talking about. Need a biospecimen for heinous experiments? Just order s.o. be declared a terrorist.

#Cybertorture finally named & recognized by UN Special Raporteur, Nils Melzer. This is what we the victims of technopsychopaths at the 80 Fusion Centers across the USA are talking about. Need a biospecimen for heinous experiments? Just order s.o. be declared a terrorist. No proof

Geordie Rose – Quantum Computing: Artificial Intelligence Is Here. University Illinois/University Chicago Super Computer Quantum Summit from Illinois SmartState DEFENSE, AEROSPACE, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL INSTITUTE HEALTH, NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION,, MILITARY CONTRACTORS, UNIVERSITIES partners list for the ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX PARTNERS. https://youtu.be/PqN_2jDVbOU

http://www.youtube.com/watch

Geordie Rose – Quantum Computing: Artificial Intelligence Is Here. University Illinois/University Chicago Super Computer Quantum Summit from Illinois SmartState DEFENSE, AEROSPACE, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL INSTITUTE HEALTH, NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, UNIVERSITIES partners list for the ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE https://youtu.be/PqN_2jDVbOU

http://www.youtube.com/watch

What are Brainwaves ? Types of Brain waves | EEG sensor and brain wave – UK

WHAT ARE BRAINWAVES? At the root of all our thoughts, emotions and behaviours is the communication between neurons within our brains. Brainwaves are produced by synchronised electrical pulses from masses of neurons communicating with each other. Brainwaves are detected using sensors placed on the scalp. They are divided into bandwidths to describe their functions (below), but are bestContinue reading “What are Brainwaves ? Types of Brain waves | EEG sensor and brain wave – UK”

What are the Different types of Brainwave Entrainment? – UK

Brain training excellence since 2007 YOU ARE HERE Home TYPES OF BRAINWAVE ENTRAINMENT   Because half the useful brainwave frequencies (.3-40Hz) are below the hearing range of the human ear (20Hz-20,000Hz), several techniques have been developed to overcome this physical limitation.    This is a quick overview of the different techniques, with a short sampleContinue reading “What are the Different types of Brainwave Entrainment? – UK”

Today is UN International Day in Support of Victim

Today is UN International Day in Support of Victims of Torture. The type of modern-day torture that I and 3 million innocent U.S. citizens are being tortured with, by illegally using electromagnetic weapons and through-the-wall radar to enter our homes and brutally assault our bodies around-the-clock, by illegally performing “Weapons Testing,” has been defined byContinue reading “Today is UN International Day in Support of Victim”

CYBER SECURITY CYBER STALKING TARGETING FEDERAL LAWS

These are the Federal Stalking laws for us to use: Case 1:20-mj-02398-MBB *SEALED*Document 3-2 Filed 06/11/2020 Page 3 of 51 Title 18, United States Code, Section 2261A, the federal cyberstalking statute,provides in pertinent part: (2) with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with  intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate anotherContinue reading “CYBER SECURITY CYBER STALKING TARGETING FEDERAL LAWS”

THEACTIVITIES OFDOD INTELLIGENCE COMPONENTS THAT AFFECTUNITED STATES PERSONSDECEMBER 1982UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR POLICYDoD 52401-R (HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION)

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSEPROCEDURES GOVERNING THEACTIVITIES OFDOD INTELLIGENCE COMPONENTS THAT AFFECTUNITED STATESPERSONSDECEMBER 1982UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR POLICYDoD 52401-Rhttps://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.138/q0k.a5d.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/US-DOD-Directive-5240.1R-Procedure-13.pdf DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSEPROCEDURES GOVERNING THEACTIVITIES OFDOD INTELLIGENCE COMPONENTS THAT AFFECTUNITED STATESPERSONSDECEMBER 1982UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR POLICYDoD 52401-RFOREWORDThis DoD regulation sets forth procedures governing the activities of DoD intelligence components that affect United States persons. It implements DoDContinue reading “THEACTIVITIES OFDOD INTELLIGENCE COMPONENTS THAT AFFECTUNITED STATES PERSONSDECEMBER 1982UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR POLICYDoD 52401-R (HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION)”

Same as my story injected with syringe via a shot. Brain Research with universities, defense and intelligence agencies. Same as Illinois SmartState Military Industrial Complex university OFNILLINOIS Urbana c hip AI GN list. Mind Control – Wires in the Brain .. .Deborah Tavares 01-07-2015 on the … https://youtu.be/d933ac8zYGE

http://www.youtube.com/watch

The Virtual 2020 BRAIN Initiative Investigators Meetinghttps://www.labroots.com/virtual-event/2020-6th-annual-brain-initiative-investigators-virtual-meetingMENUMeeting Begins 10:30 AM EDT June 1, 20202020 6th annual BRAIN Initiative Investigators Virtual MeetingREGISTER NOW FOR ON DEMANDWe appreciate as the world continues to wrestle with adjusting to the consequence of the coronavirus outbreak, and we at NIH continue to work diligently and thoughtfully to try to find ways to address your diverse needs. After exploring multiple options for the 2020 BRAIN Initiative® Investigators Meeting, we have determined the safest, most responsible option for the BRAIN community and all interested parties is to hold this conference as a virtual event.We hope you will join us starting May 27, 2020 to explore on-demand content. Meeting programming to include broadcast of scientific presentations with live Question and Answer will begin at 10:30am EDT on Monday, June 1 and extend through 6:30pm EDT on Tuesday, June 2, 2020. Content will be available on-demand for 12-months following the event. To access the virtual event, remember to log in with the same email that you used to register, using your registration confirmation number as your password, or if you are an existing LabRoots user, your normal LabRoots password.The BRAIN Initiative® Investigators Meeting will convene BRAIN Initiative awardees, staff, and leadership from the contributing federal agencies (NIH, NSF, DARPA, IARPA, and FDA), plus representatives and investigators from participating non-federal organizations, and members of the media, public, and Congress. The purpose of this open meeting is to provide a forum for discussing exciting scientific developments and potential new directions, and to identify areas for collaboration and research coordination.Federal BRAIN awardees should refer to their agency-specific email and/or federal project/program manager for additional instructions and details regarding participation in this meeting.The target audience for this meeting includes:Federally funded and non-federally funded BRAIN Initiative investigatorsNon-federal organizations and groups invested in the BRAIN InitiativeBRAIN Initiative-related investigators at largeFederal staffMembers of CongressPatient and advocacy groupsMedia and general publicFor general questions about meeting content and scientific programming:BrainInitiativeConferences@mail.nih.govFor registration questions:NINDS Events Team, Kathy Berry kberry@infinityconferences.com

You are viewing archived BRAIN Initiative content that is no longer current but is available for reference and record keeping purposes.Town Hall & Reception at the 2015 Society for Neuroscience Meeting in Chicago, IL. When: Tuesday, October 20th, 2015 6:30-9:00 pm. My workplace harassment began here. Where: McCormick Place Convention Center Room S103

ILLINOIS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND UNIVERSITIES BRAIN INITIATIVE RESEARCH. MY TARGETING BEGAN WHEN THIS WAS DONE in 2015. NIH, NIMH& FDA IS UNDER HEALTH HUMAN MY EMPLOY. DARPA & IARPA are DEFENSE AND INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES. NSF. KAVLI AND PRIVATE CORPORATIONS ARE UNDER UNIVERSITIES https://braininitiative.nih.gov/News-Events/event/brain-initiative-2015-updates-and-outreach The BRAIN Initiative in 2015: Updates and Outreach You are viewingContinue reading “You are viewing archived BRAIN Initiative content that is no longer current but is available for reference and record keeping purposes.Town Hall & Reception at the 2015 Society for Neuroscience Meeting in Chicago, IL. When: Tuesday, October 20th, 2015 6:30-9:00 pm. My workplace harassment began here. Where: McCormick Place Convention Center Room S103”

ILLINOIS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND UNIVERSITIES BRAIN INITIATIVE RESEARCH. My targeting began when this was done in 2015. NIH & FDA IS under human services my employ. https://braininitiative.nih.gov/News-Events/event/brain-initiative-2015-updates-and-outreach The BRAIN Initiative in 2015: Updates and Outreach You are viewing archived BRAIN Initiative content that is no longer current but is available for reference and record keeping purposes. Town Hall & Reception at the 2015 Society for Neuroscience Meeting in Chicago, IL. When: Tuesday, October 20th, 2015 6:30-9:00 pm Where: McCormick Place Convention Center Room S103 Additional Event Information: Description: This interactive panel discussion/Q&A session will feature updates on activities and opportunities offered by the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative. Representatives from federal agencies, private research foundations and universities will be present. A reception with speakers will immediately follow. For details on registration, speaker names, and event contact information, we will continue to update this website regularly. Speakers: Kristen Bowsher, Ph.D. (FDA) Miyoung Chun, Ph.D. (The Kavli Foundation) Catherine Cotell, Ph.D. (IARPA) Greg Farber, Ph.D. (NIMH) Walter Koroshetz, M.D. (NINDS) Allan Jones, Ph.D. (Allen Institute for Brain Science) Jim Olds, Ph.D. (NSF) Alyssa Picchini-Schaffer, Ph.D. (Simons Foundation) Justin Sanchez, Ph.D. (DARPA) Nelson Spruston, Ph.D. (HHMI/Janelia Research Campus) Program Agenda: 6:30-6:40pm​ – The BRAIN Initiative: Taking the Next Steps Walter Koroshetz, M.D., Director, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) on behalf of the NIH BRAIN IC Directors Committee Panel Discussions with Federal Agencies and Private Foundations Updates on BRAIN Initiative Activities and Funding Opportunities 6:40-7:10pm​ – Panel 1: Federal Agencies Greg Farber, Ph.D., Director, Office of Technology Development and Coordination, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) James Olds, Ph.D., Assistant Director, Directorate for Biological Sciences, National Science Foundation (NSF) Justin Sanchez, Ph.D., Program Manager, Biological Technologies Office, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Catherine Cotell, Ph.D., Program Manager, Director, Office of Incisive Analysis, Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) Kristen Bowsher, Ph.D., Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7:10-7:25pm​ – Question and Answer Session 7:25-7:45pm​ – Panel 2: Private Foundations Allan Jones, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer, Allen Institute for Brain Science Miyoung Chun, Ph.D., Executive Vice President of Science Programs, The Kavli Foundation Alyssa Picchini-Schaffer, Ph.D., Chief Scientist and Fellow, Senior Scientist, Simons Foundation Collaboration on the Global Brain Nelson Spruston, Ph.D., Scientific Program Director, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Research Campus 7:25-7:45pm​ – Reception sponsored by the Kavli Foundation Universities & Private Groups Attending (PDF – 27.1KB) https://www.braininitiative.nih.gov/meetings/SFNOct2015.htm Ms. Adams

The BRAIN Initiative in 2015: Updates and Outreach You are viewing archived BRAIN Initiative content that is no longer current but is available for reference and record keeping purposes. Town Hall & Reception at the 2015 Society for Neuroscience Meeting in Chicago, IL. When: Tuesday, October 20th, 2015 6:30-9:00 pm Where: McCormick Place Convention CenterContinue reading “ILLINOIS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND UNIVERSITIES BRAIN INITIATIVE RESEARCH. My targeting began when this was done in 2015. NIH & FDA IS under human services my employ. https://braininitiative.nih.gov/News-Events/event/brain-initiative-2015-updates-and-outreach The BRAIN Initiative in 2015: Updates and Outreach You are viewing archived BRAIN Initiative content that is no longer current but is available for reference and record keeping purposes. Town Hall & Reception at the 2015 Society for Neuroscience Meeting in Chicago, IL. When: Tuesday, October 20th, 2015 6:30-9:00 pm Where: McCormick Place Convention Center Room S103 Additional Event Information: Description: This interactive panel discussion/Q&A session will feature updates on activities and opportunities offered by the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative. Representatives from federal agencies, private research foundations and universities will be present. A reception with speakers will immediately follow. For details on registration, speaker names, and event contact information, we will continue to update this website regularly. Speakers: Kristen Bowsher, Ph.D. (FDA) Miyoung Chun, Ph.D. (The Kavli Foundation) Catherine Cotell, Ph.D. (IARPA) Greg Farber, Ph.D. (NIMH) Walter Koroshetz, M.D. (NINDS) Allan Jones, Ph.D. (Allen Institute for Brain Science) Jim Olds, Ph.D. (NSF) Alyssa Picchini-Schaffer, Ph.D. (Simons Foundation) Justin Sanchez, Ph.D. (DARPA) Nelson Spruston, Ph.D. (HHMI/Janelia Research Campus) Program Agenda: 6:30-6:40pm​ – The BRAIN Initiative: Taking the Next Steps Walter Koroshetz, M.D., Director, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) on behalf of the NIH BRAIN IC Directors Committee Panel Discussions with Federal Agencies and Private Foundations Updates on BRAIN Initiative Activities and Funding Opportunities 6:40-7:10pm​ – Panel 1: Federal Agencies Greg Farber, Ph.D., Director, Office of Technology Development and Coordination, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) James Olds, Ph.D., Assistant Director, Directorate for Biological Sciences, National Science Foundation (NSF) Justin Sanchez, Ph.D., Program Manager, Biological Technologies Office, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Catherine Cotell, Ph.D., Program Manager, Director, Office of Incisive Analysis, Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) Kristen Bowsher, Ph.D., Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7:10-7:25pm​ – Question and Answer Session 7:25-7:45pm​ – Panel 2: Private Foundations Allan Jones, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer, Allen Institute for Brain Science Miyoung Chun, Ph.D., Executive Vice President of Science Programs, The Kavli Foundation Alyssa Picchini-Schaffer, Ph.D., Chief Scientist and Fellow, Senior Scientist, Simons Foundation Collaboration on the Global Brain Nelson Spruston, Ph.D., Scientific Program Director, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Research Campus 7:25-7:45pm​ – Reception sponsored by the Kavli Foundation Universities & Private Groups Attending (PDF – 27.1KB) https://www.braininitiative.nih.gov/meetings/SFNOct2015.htm Ms. Adams”

Patents of Mind Control and Behavior Modification TechnologiesNov13on 13. November 2017 at 19:53Posted In: English, Mind Control / Electronic Weapons HarassmentNervous system excitation device – US Patent 3393279This invention relates to electromagnetic excitation of the nervous system of a mammal and pertains more parcularly to a method and apparatus for exciting the nervous system of a person with electromagnetic waves that are capable of causing that person to become conscious of information conveyed by the electromagnetic waves.It is an object of the present invention to provide a means of initiating controllable responses of the neuro senses without applying pressure waves or stress waves to the ears or bones. Another object of this invention is to provide a means of causing a person to receive an aural perception of the sound corresponding to the audio modulation of radio frequency electromagnetic waves that are coupled with the nervous system of the person.US Patent 3393279Apparatus for the treatment of neuropsychic and somatic diseases with heat, light, sound and vhf electromagnetic radiation – US Patent 3773049 AAn apparatus for the treatment of neuropsychic and somatic disorders wherein light-, sound-, VHF electromagnetic field-pulses and radiation from light-, sound-, VHF electromcagnetic field- and heat-sources, respectively, are simultaneously applied by means of a control unit to the patient’s central nervous system with a predermined repetition rate. The light radiation and sound radiation sources are made so as to exert an adequate and monotonous influence of the light-and sound-radiation on the patient’s visual analyzers and auditory analyzers, respectively.US Patent 3773049 AApparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves – US Patent 3951134Apparatus for and method of sensing brain waves at a position remote from a subject whereby electromagnetic signals of different frequencies are simultaneously transmitted to the brain of the subject in which the signals interfere with one another to yield a waveform which is modulated by the subject’s brain waves. The interference waveform which is representative of the brain wave activity is re-transmitted by the brain to a receiver where it is demodulated and amplified. The demodulated waveform is then displayed for visual viewing and routed to a computer for further processing and analysis. The demodulated waveform also can be used to produce a compensating signal which is transmitted back to the brain to effect a desired change in electrical activity therein.US Patent 3951134Device for the induction of specific brain wave patterns – US Patent 4335710 ABrain wave patterns associated with relaxed and meditative states in a subject are gradually induced without deleterious chemical or neurological side effects. A white noise generator has the spectral noise density of its output signal modulated in a manner similar to the brain wave patterns by a switching transistor within a spectrum modulator. The modulated white noise signal is amplified by output amplifier and converted to an audio signal by acoustic transducer. Ramp generator gradually increases the voltage received by and resultant output frequency of voltage controlled oscillator whereby switching transistor periodically shunts the high frequency components of the white noise signal to ground.US Patent 4335710 AHearing device – US Patent 4858612A method and apparatus for simulation of hearing in mammals by introduction of a plurality of microwaves into the region of the auditory cortex is shown and described. A microphone is used to transform sound signals into electrical signals which are in turn analyzed and processed to provide controls for generating a plurality of microwave signals at different frequencies. The multifrequency microwaves are then applied to the brain in the region of the auditory cortex. By this method sounds are perceived by the mammal which are representative of the original sound received by the microphone.US Patent 4858612Hearing system – US Patent 4877027 ASound is induced in the head of a person by radiating the head with microwaves in the range of 100 megahertz to 10,000 megahertz that are modulated with a particular waveform. The waveform consists of frequency modulated bursts. Each burst is made up of ten to twenty uniformly spaced pulses grouped tightly together. The burst width is between 500 nanoseconds and 100 microseconds. The pulse width is in the range of 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond. The bursts are frequency modulated by the audio input to create the sensation of hearing in the person whose head is irradiated.US Patent 4877027 ASilent subliminal presentation system – US Patent 5159703A silent communications system in which nonaural carriers, in the very low or very high audio frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum, are amplitude or frequency modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones or piezoelectric transducers. The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic or optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the listener.US Patent 5159703Method of inducing mental, emotional and physical states of consciousness, including specific mental activity, in human beings – US Patent 5213562 AA method having applicability in replication of desired consciousness states; in the training of an individual to replicate such a state of consciousness without further audio stimulation; and in the transferring of such states from one human being to another through the imposition of one individual’s EEG, superimposed on desired stereo signals, on another individual, by inducement of a binaural beat phenomenon.US Patent 5213562 AMethod of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness – US Patent 5356368 AImproved methods and apparatus for entraining human brain patterns, employing frequency following response (FFR) techniques, facilitate attainment of desired states of consciousness. In one embodiment, a plurality of electroencephalogram (EEG) waveforms, characteristic of a given state of consciousness, are combined to yield an EEG waveform to which subjects may be susceptible more readily. In another embodiment, sleep patterns are reproduced based on observed brain patterns during portions of a sleep cycle; entrainment principles are applied to induce sleep. In yet another embodiment, entrainment principles are applied in the work environment, to induce and maintain a desired level of consciousness. A portable device also is described.US Patent 5356368 AMethod and an associated apparatus for remotely determining information as to person’s emotional state – US Patent 5507291 AIn a method for remotely determining information relating to a person’s emotional state, an waveform energy having a predetermined frequency and a predetermined intensity is generated and wirelessly transmitted towards a remotely located subject. Waveform energy emitted from the subject is detected and automatically analyzed to derive information relating to the individual’s emotional state. Physiological or physical parameters of blood pressure, pulse rate, pupil size, respiration rate and perspiration level are measured and compared with reference values to provide information utilizable in evaluating interviewee’s responses or possibly criminal intent in security sensitive areas.US Patent 5507291 AUltrasonic speech translator and communications system – US Patent 5539705A wireless communication system undetectable by radio frequency methods for converting audio signals, including human voice, to electronic signals in the ultrasonic frequency range, transmitting the ultrasonic signal by way of acoustical pressure waves across a carrier medium, including gases, liquids, or solids, and reconverting the ultrasonic acoustical pressure waves back to the original audio signal. The ultrasonic speech translator and communication system includes an ultrasonic transmitting device and an ultrasonic receiving device. The ultrasonic transmitting device accepts as input an audio signal such as human voice input from a microphone (114) or tape deck. The ultrasonic transmitting device (100) frequency modulates an ultrasonic carrier signal with the audio signal producing a frequency modulated ultrasonic carrier signal, which is transmitted via acoustical pressure waves across a carrier medium such as gases, liquids or solids. The ultrasonic receiving device converts the frequency modulated ultrasonic acoustical pressure waves to a frequency modulated electronic signal, demodulates the audio signal from the ultrasonic carrier signal, and conditions the demodulated audio signal to reproduce the original audio signal at its output.US Patent 5539705Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity – US Patent 6011991 AA system and method for enabling human beings to communicate by way of their monitored brain activity. The brain activity of an individual is monitored and transmitted to a remote location (e.g. by satellite). At the remote location, the monitored brain activity is compared with pre-recorded normalized brain activity curves, waveforms, or patterns to determine if a match or substantial match is found. If such a match is found, then the computer at the remote location determines that the individual was attempting to communicate the word, phrase, or thought corresponding to the matched stored normalized signal.US Patent 6011991 AAcoustic cannon – US 5973999 AAn acoustic cannon has a plurality of acoustic sources with output ends symmetrically arranged in a planar array about a central point. Pressure pulses are generated in each acoustic source at substantially the same time. The pressure pulses exit the output ends as sonic pulses. Interaction of the sonic pulses generates a Mach disk, a non-linear shock wave that travels along an axis perpendicular to the planar array with limited radial diffusion. The Mach disk retains the intensity of the sonic pulses for a time and a distance significantly longer than that achievable from a single sonic source. The acoustic cannon is useful as a non-lethal weapon to disperse crowds or disable a hostile target.US Patent 5973999 ASubliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous systems – US Patent 6017302 AIn human subjects, sensory resonances can be excited by subliminal atmospheric acoustic pulses that are tuned to the resonance frequency. The 1/2 Hz sensory resonance affects the autonomic nervous system and may cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near 1/2 Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation. For these effects to occur, the acoustic intensity must lie in a certain deeply subliminal range. Suitable apparatus consists of a portable battery-powered source of weak subaudio acoustic radiation. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or sexual arousal, and clinically for the control and perhaps treatment of insomnia, tremors, epileptic seizures, and anxiety disorders. There is further application as a nonlethal weapon that can be used in law enforcement standoff situations, for causing drowsiness and disorientation in targeted subjects. It is then preferable to use venting acoustic monopoles in the form of a device that inhales and exhales air with subaudio frequency.US Patent 6017302 ANervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors – US Patent 6506148 B2Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors – US Patent 6506148 B2US Patent 6506148 B2Apparatus for audibly communicating speech using the radio frequency hearing effect – US Patent 6587729 B2A modulation process with a fully suppressed carrier and input preprocessor filtering to produce an encoded output; for amplitude modulation (AM) and audio speech preprocessor filtering, intelligible subjective sound is produced when the encoded signal is demodulated using the RF Hearing Effect. Suitable forms of carrier suppressed modulation include single sideband (SSB) and carrier suppressed amplitude modulation (CSAM), with both sidebands present.US Patent 6587729 B2└ Tags: Behavior modification, Electronic Harassment, Mind control, Patents, Psychotronic Warfare, Remote Neural Monitoring, Targeted Individuals, Technologies, v2k, Voice to skull

Patents of Mind Control and Behavior Modification Technologies Nov13on 13. November 2017 at 19:53Posted In: English, Mind Control / Electronic Weapons Harassment Nervous system excitation device – US Patent 3393279 This invention relates to electromagnetic excitation of the nervous system of a mammal and pertains more parcularly to a method and apparatus for exciting the nervous system of a personContinue reading “Patents of Mind Control and Behavior Modification TechnologiesNov13on 13. November 2017 at 19:53Posted In: English, Mind Control / Electronic Weapons HarassmentNervous system excitation device – US Patent 3393279This invention relates to electromagnetic excitation of the nervous system of a mammal and pertains more parcularly to a method and apparatus for exciting the nervous system of a person with electromagnetic waves that are capable of causing that person to become conscious of information conveyed by the electromagnetic waves.It is an object of the present invention to provide a means of initiating controllable responses of the neuro senses without applying pressure waves or stress waves to the ears or bones. Another object of this invention is to provide a means of causing a person to receive an aural perception of the sound corresponding to the audio modulation of radio frequency electromagnetic waves that are coupled with the nervous system of the person.US Patent 3393279Apparatus for the treatment of neuropsychic and somatic diseases with heat, light, sound and vhf electromagnetic radiation – US Patent 3773049 AAn apparatus for the treatment of neuropsychic and somatic disorders wherein light-, sound-, VHF electromagnetic field-pulses and radiation from light-, sound-, VHF electromcagnetic field- and heat-sources, respectively, are simultaneously applied by means of a control unit to the patient’s central nervous system with a predermined repetition rate. The light radiation and sound radiation sources are made so as to exert an adequate and monotonous influence of the light-and sound-radiation on the patient’s visual analyzers and auditory analyzers, respectively.US Patent 3773049 AApparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves – US Patent 3951134Apparatus for and method of sensing brain waves at a position remote from a subject whereby electromagnetic signals of different frequencies are simultaneously transmitted to the brain of the subject in which the signals interfere with one another to yield a waveform which is modulated by the subject’s brain waves. The interference waveform which is representative of the brain wave activity is re-transmitted by the brain to a receiver where it is demodulated and amplified. The demodulated waveform is then displayed for visual viewing and routed to a computer for further processing and analysis. The demodulated waveform also can be used to produce a compensating signal which is transmitted back to the brain to effect a desired change in electrical activity therein.US Patent 3951134Device for the induction of specific brain wave patterns – US Patent 4335710 ABrain wave patterns associated with relaxed and meditative states in a subject are gradually induced without deleterious chemical or neurological side effects. A white noise generator has the spectral noise density of its output signal modulated in a manner similar to the brain wave patterns by a switching transistor within a spectrum modulator. The modulated white noise signal is amplified by output amplifier and converted to an audio signal by acoustic transducer. Ramp generator gradually increases the voltage received by and resultant output frequency of voltage controlled oscillator whereby switching transistor periodically shunts the high frequency components of the white noise signal to ground.US Patent 4335710 AHearing device – US Patent 4858612A method and apparatus for simulation of hearing in mammals by introduction of a plurality of microwaves into the region of the auditory cortex is shown and described. A microphone is used to transform sound signals into electrical signals which are in turn analyzed and processed to provide controls for generating a plurality of microwave signals at different frequencies. The multifrequency microwaves are then applied to the brain in the region of the auditory cortex. By this method sounds are perceived by the mammal which are representative of the original sound received by the microphone.US Patent 4858612Hearing system – US Patent 4877027 ASound is induced in the head of a person by radiating the head with microwaves in the range of 100 megahertz to 10,000 megahertz that are modulated with a particular waveform. The waveform consists of frequency modulated bursts. Each burst is made up of ten to twenty uniformly spaced pulses grouped tightly together. The burst width is between 500 nanoseconds and 100 microseconds. The pulse width is in the range of 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond. The bursts are frequency modulated by the audio input to create the sensation of hearing in the person whose head is irradiated.US Patent 4877027 ASilent subliminal presentation system – US Patent 5159703A silent communications system in which nonaural carriers, in the very low or very high audio frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum, are amplitude or frequency modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones or piezoelectric transducers. The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic or optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the listener.US Patent 5159703Method of inducing mental, emotional and physical states of consciousness, including specific mental activity, in human beings – US Patent 5213562 AA method having applicability in replication of desired consciousness states; in the training of an individual to replicate such a state of consciousness without further audio stimulation; and in the transferring of such states from one human being to another through the imposition of one individual’s EEG, superimposed on desired stereo signals, on another individual, by inducement of a binaural beat phenomenon.US Patent 5213562 AMethod of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness – US Patent 5356368 AImproved methods and apparatus for entraining human brain patterns, employing frequency following response (FFR) techniques, facilitate attainment of desired states of consciousness. In one embodiment, a plurality of electroencephalogram (EEG) waveforms, characteristic of a given state of consciousness, are combined to yield an EEG waveform to which subjects may be susceptible more readily. In another embodiment, sleep patterns are reproduced based on observed brain patterns during portions of a sleep cycle; entrainment principles are applied to induce sleep. In yet another embodiment, entrainment principles are applied in the work environment, to induce and maintain a desired level of consciousness. A portable device also is described.US Patent 5356368 AMethod and an associated apparatus for remotely determining information as to person’s emotional state – US Patent 5507291 AIn a method for remotely determining information relating to a person’s emotional state, an waveform energy having a predetermined frequency and a predetermined intensity is generated and wirelessly transmitted towards a remotely located subject. Waveform energy emitted from the subject is detected and automatically analyzed to derive information relating to the individual’s emotional state. Physiological or physical parameters of blood pressure, pulse rate, pupil size, respiration rate and perspiration level are measured and compared with reference values to provide information utilizable in evaluating interviewee’s responses or possibly criminal intent in security sensitive areas.US Patent 5507291 AUltrasonic speech translator and communications system – US Patent 5539705A wireless communication system undetectable by radio frequency methods for converting audio signals, including human voice, to electronic signals in the ultrasonic frequency range, transmitting the ultrasonic signal by way of acoustical pressure waves across a carrier medium, including gases, liquids, or solids, and reconverting the ultrasonic acoustical pressure waves back to the original audio signal. The ultrasonic speech translator and communication system includes an ultrasonic transmitting device and an ultrasonic receiving device. The ultrasonic transmitting device accepts as input an audio signal such as human voice input from a microphone (114) or tape deck. The ultrasonic transmitting device (100) frequency modulates an ultrasonic carrier signal with the audio signal producing a frequency modulated ultrasonic carrier signal, which is transmitted via acoustical pressure waves across a carrier medium such as gases, liquids or solids. The ultrasonic receiving device converts the frequency modulated ultrasonic acoustical pressure waves to a frequency modulated electronic signal, demodulates the audio signal from the ultrasonic carrier signal, and conditions the demodulated audio signal to reproduce the original audio signal at its output.US Patent 5539705Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity – US Patent 6011991 AA system and method for enabling human beings to communicate by way of their monitored brain activity. The brain activity of an individual is monitored and transmitted to a remote location (e.g. by satellite). At the remote location, the monitored brain activity is compared with pre-recorded normalized brain activity curves, waveforms, or patterns to determine if a match or substantial match is found. If such a match is found, then the computer at the remote location determines that the individual was attempting to communicate the word, phrase, or thought corresponding to the matched stored normalized signal.US Patent 6011991 AAcoustic cannon – US 5973999 AAn acoustic cannon has a plurality of acoustic sources with output ends symmetrically arranged in a planar array about a central point. Pressure pulses are generated in each acoustic source at substantially the same time. The pressure pulses exit the output ends as sonic pulses. Interaction of the sonic pulses generates a Mach disk, a non-linear shock wave that travels along an axis perpendicular to the planar array with limited radial diffusion. The Mach disk retains the intensity of the sonic pulses for a time and a distance significantly longer than that achievable from a single sonic source. The acoustic cannon is useful as a non-lethal weapon to disperse crowds or disable a hostile target.US Patent 5973999 ASubliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous systems – US Patent 6017302 AIn human subjects, sensory resonances can be excited by subliminal atmospheric acoustic pulses that are tuned to the resonance frequency. The 1/2 Hz sensory resonance affects the autonomic nervous system and may cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near 1/2 Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation. For these effects to occur, the acoustic intensity must lie in a certain deeply subliminal range. Suitable apparatus consists of a portable battery-powered source of weak subaudio acoustic radiation. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or sexual arousal, and clinically for the control and perhaps treatment of insomnia, tremors, epileptic seizures, and anxiety disorders. There is further application as a nonlethal weapon that can be used in law enforcement standoff situations, for causing drowsiness and disorientation in targeted subjects. It is then preferable to use venting acoustic monopoles in the form of a device that inhales and exhales air with subaudio frequency.US Patent 6017302 ANervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors – US Patent 6506148 B2Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors – US Patent 6506148 B2US Patent 6506148 B2Apparatus for audibly communicating speech using the radio frequency hearing effect – US Patent 6587729 B2A modulation process with a fully suppressed carrier and input preprocessor filtering to produce an encoded output; for amplitude modulation (AM) and audio speech preprocessor filtering, intelligible subjective sound is produced when the encoded signal is demodulated using the RF Hearing Effect. Suitable forms of carrier suppressed modulation include single sideband (SSB) and carrier suppressed amplitude modulation (CSAM), with both sidebands present.US Patent 6587729 B2└ Tags: Behavior modification, Electronic Harassment, Mind control, Patents, Psychotronic Warfare, Remote Neural Monitoring, Targeted Individuals, Technologies, v2k, Voice to skull”

DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS SHRIEVER AIRFORCE BASEDirected Energy Weapons (D.E.W.) are microwave scalar-beam weapons that are used to attack Targeted Individuals. The satellite-based system is called a Vircator (Patent #4345220) and it produces an invisible, scalar microwave beam of approx 1/2 inch (1.25 cm) diameter. These satellite weapons and cell tower weapons are controlled from Schriever Air Force Base (www.schriever.af.mil) near Colorado Springs, and can cause excruciating pain when pointed at someone on the ground. The CIA in Denver runs this illegal program, called an Unacknowledged Special Access Program (USAP). Whistleblowers, such as Ed Snowden and Julian Assange are two of the targets. Mark Lenzi, the State Department’s electronic signals expert, has stated that the Cuban diplomats were definitely attacked by microwave weapons.

MILITARY TECHNOLOGY USED ON INNOCENT CITIZENS KNOWN AS TARGETED INDIVIDUALS. ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX PARTNERS LIST UNDER UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS URBANA CHAMPAIGN. UILABS. MXD. CITY TECH. MILITARY AND INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES.

The State of Illinois Economic Profile April, 2017 This study was prepared under contract with the University of Illinois, with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of the University of Illinois and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile State Economic Profile The Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA), an arm of the U.S. Department of Defense, initiated the Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program to assist communities in planning for adjustments and resiliency in the face of defense industry changes. As of the beginning of 2016, a project team made up of the University of Illinois Office of Vice President for Research (OVPR), the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Voorhees Center, and the Quad Cities Chamber of Commerce, has begun work on the State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment Project to assess the impact of changes in defense industry spending in Illinois, and to assist impacted sectors in their efforts to develop plans and options to mitigate detrimental impacts. The State of Illinois was ranked number 48 of the 50 states for defense spending as a percentage of total state GDP in 2014 with only 0.8% of the state GDP attributable to it. Based on a recently released report, spending increased from $5.6 billion in 2014 to $7.0 billion in 2015, moving the state in ranking from 48th to 43rd of the 50 states between 2014 and 2015. In terms of absolute defense spending, the state’s position jumped from 23rd to 19th, i.e., from $5.6 Billion to $7 billion between 2014 and 2015. Measured both as a proportion of state GDP and total spending, there is 1 a significant increase in Illinois in 2015 ($7 billion) compared to 2014 ($5.6 billion). Illinois’ increased share is notable given that during the same period, total national defense spending declined from $418 to $408 billion. In Fiscal Year 2015, while $4.8 billion of total defense spending was in the form of defense contracts, $2.2 billion consisted of spending on defense personnel. Defense contracts were largely for manufacturing of Supplies & Equipment (a category with 64% of annual defense contracts). The top direct defense spending locations in the state include: Lake, Cook, St. Clair, DuPage, Rock Island, Winnebago, Peoria, and Madison counties. These eight counties currently account for nearly $6 billion of annual defense spending in the state. As part of the project team, the UIC Voorhees Center for Neighborhood and Community Improvement analyzes data, conducts studies, and engages with stakeholders to inform and assist impacted sectors in their efforts to develop plans and strategies. The first series of these efforts involved compiling community and economic profiles, which were shared with community stakeholders in five regions of the state (Quad Cities, Rockford, Chicago Metro, Metro East, and Peoria) in order to inform the direction of the state DIA Project (these regional economic profiles can be accessed at http://www.illinoisdia.org/). Second, a summary analysis was conducted to establish a relative understanding of the economies of the five sub-state regions in terms of their current composition, changes in employment, and occupations. More recently, these initial efforts were followed by a detailed 1Defense Spending by State reports (for FY 2014 and FY 2015) are available at http://oea.gov/defense- spending-state-fiscal-year-2015?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery. Note that Fiscal Year 2014 defense spending figures from this same source were used for the Regional Economic Profiles that have been completed for the five Illinois DIA regions. economic composition and change analysis with the purpose of providing a deeper understanding of the regions’ economies in terms of their current industrial composition and to identify drivers of changes in employment. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 2 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Similar to the regional profiles, the primary purpose of this state economic profile is to provide baseline economic and industry information for state-wide and regional defense adjustment and industrial diversification strategies. For example, identification of regionally concentrated industries and those that perform substantial amounts of DoD contracts would aid efforts in identifying industrial clusters and potentially making connections across manufacturers in related industries. Different from regional level analyses, this profile focuses on additional measures of economic growth and competitiveness such as establishment births and deaths, gross state 2 Each economic and industry-level indicator is analyzed in comparison with the national average to provide a better understanding of local conditions and trends. A comparative understanding of a state’s economy in terms of compositional change and performance informs policy makers and analysts to better position the state in the national economy. To the extent that data is available, product, state per capita income, wages by occupation groups, and international trade statistics. the profile analyzes changes over a period of 10 years—long enough to reveal important dynamics, but short enough to focus on the kinds of local changes that may be malleable through state-level policy and planning activities. Drawing on local and national data sources, this profile considers both the fundamental economic conditions and sectoral drivers of the state economy. The economic indicators/industrial data items analyzed are divided into five main groups: Basic economic indicators: Indicators that measure economic conditions and help evaluate economic performance: (1) Employment and its sectoral distribution, (2) Unemployment rate, (3) Unemployment insurance claims, (4) Annual wages, and (5) Occupations. Descriptive analysis of these indicators help determine how the state economy is faring relative to its position in the past, or its current position as measured against the national economy. Defense related industrial activities: The profile identifies specific manufacturing and professional/technical services industries in which businesses may be performing defense contract work or are part of the defense industry supply chain. By analyzing employment trends in these industries in comparison with the nation, the profile explores the “defense activity-industrial performance” nexus. Finally, the state’s share of national defense contracts is analyzed, and local industries that perform substantial work originating from the Department of Defense are identified. Industrial Specialization: This analysis identifies industry sectors in which the state economy is specialized relative to the national economy. For this purpose, we calculate employment-based location quotients (LQs). In addition to indicating how specialized a local economy is relative to the larger economy, location quotients are essential in determining the economic base of a local economy. In the analysis of LQs, particular attention is given to specific manufacturing and professional/technical services industries in which businesses may be performing defense contract 2 These extra measures were not included in regional economic profiles because either data was not available at sub-state level (e.g., international trade) or that most regions are too small for their fluctuations to be meaningful. work or are part of the defense industry supply chain. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 3 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Drivers of State Employment Change: We analyze all industry sectors at the 2- and 3-digit NAICS level for employment change from 2005 to 2015. A shift-share analysis is conducted to better understand how the local area economy is changing, and in which industries it is most competitive. By disaggregating the portions of change that result from local factors versus broader changes in the national economy or in the particular industry, the shift-share analysis sheds light on the sources of growth and decline in the state economy. Export Performance of State Industries: Foreign trade statistics provide an trade situation – and market development and penetration studies. They also constitute a measure of the impact of competition faced by state exporting firms/industries. Analysis of foreign trade data might also inform the state transportation and logistics industry in the critical area of appraisal of the general anticipating the need for – future facilities and equipment. Notes on definitions and data sources may be found at the end of this document. If there are any questions, please contact Yittayih Zelalem, Co-director of the Nathalie P. Voorhees Center for Neighborhood & Community Improvement at the University of Illinois at Chicago at 312-996-6674 or e-mail at: yittazel@uic.edu. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 4 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile State Economic Highlights  The state population grew approximately 2.0% from 2005 to 2015, a much slower rate than the nation as a whole, which grew nearly 9% during the same period. Relatively slow population growth rate in the state is reflected in employment and economic output trends.  The state economy is not performing as well as the national economy. Current state employment is still below the pre-recession level. Although the state economy continues to expand after the recession ended in 2010, unlike the trend in the country, current state employment has not reached the pre-recession level yet. Shift-share analysis shows that if the state economy’s growth rate were identical to that of the national economy, then the number of jobs in the state should have grown by 346,028 between 2005 and 2015; instead, the state gained only 100,096 jobs during the same period.  Health care, retail trade, and manufacturing accounted for the largest shares of any sector in 2015, representing 13.3 percent, 10.5 percent, and 10.0 percent of employment in the state, respectively. The sectors that created the most jobs from 2005 to 2015 were health care, accommodation and food services, and professional and technical services. These sectors respectively added 119,040; 60,858; and 56,870 jobs to the state economy. Manufacturing and construction experienced the largest job losses during the same period. From 2005 to 2015, manufacturing lost more than 110,000 jobs while the construction sector lost nearly 55,000 jobs. The manufacturing sector is declining faster in Illinois than nationally.  In 2015, Illinois had a per capita personal income (PCPI) of $50,295. This PCPI ranked 15th in the United States and was 105 percent of the national average ($48,112). The 2015 PCPI reflected an increase of 10 percent from 2005 (nearly the same as the change at the national level). In 2005, the PCPI of Illinois was $45,689 and ranked 16th in the United States.  The state Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew 6.8 percent from 2005 to 2015 in real terms, lagging the national growth metric of 13.3 percent. The largest sectoral contributor to real GDP growth in Illinois was finance, insurance, and real estate. This sector accounted for approximately 3 percentage points of the total growth in real GDP. The second largest contributor was professional and business services, which accounted for 2 percentage points of the total growth in real GDP.  The current (2015) unemployment rate in the state (5.9%) is slightly higher than the national unemployment rate (5.3%). After rising sharply during the recession years of 2009 and 2010, the unemployment rate has fallen in recent years.  The current average wage for all industries in the state is $55,889 (2015). This figure is above the national figure. (According to Bureau of Labor Statistics 2015 estimates, the average annual wage across all industries was $52,942 in the U.S.). There has not been a significant change in the gap between state and national wages during the last ten years.  The state is specialized in various manufacturing, financial, and business service industries. Among those, machinery manufacturing (NAICS 333), fabricated metal product manufacturing University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 5 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile (NAICS 332) and professional and technical services (NAICS 541) are closely related to defense. State employment in fabricated metal product manufacturing declined substantially during the recession and has not completely recovered yet. While national employment increased in the last five years, local employment remained the same. State employment in professional and technical services closely follows the national trend and surpassed the pre-recession levels.  More than $60 billion worth of goods were exported from Illinois in 2015. These exports supported 333,674 jobs (nearly 6% of total state employment) and helped sustain a total of 23,252 companies. Eighty-six percent (86%) of these jobs are attributable to manufactured goods exports. Major export categories are machinery, chemicals, transportation equipment, electronic products, and electrical equipment.  Illinois’s share of U.S. exports is shrinking in recent years (Table 10). This is explained in part by the state’s contracting manufacturing sector and the fact that Illinois’s share of the U.S. population has been declining during the same period.  In 2015, $5.3 billion worth of DoD contracts were performed in Illinois. Businesses operating in manufacturing, wholesale trade, construction, and professional and technical services received the most contract dollars obligated in FY 2015; the top industries include: Medical equipment merchant wholesalers ($472 million); Construction ($387 million); Search, detection, and navigation instruments ($384 million); Heavy duty truck manufacturing ($379); Engineering services ($229 million); Aircraft manufacturing ($223 million).  Department of Defense (DoD) contracts in the state of Illinois are concentrated in two regions: Northeast Illinois and Southwest Illinois. In 2015, nearly 80 percent of Illinois DoD contracts (or 4.3 out of 5.3 billion dollars’ worth of DoD contracts) were performed in these two regions. As a share of regional gross regional product (GRP), – DoD contracts are most important to the Southwest Illinois Region, where they constituted around 4 percent of GRP in 2015. In the same year, defense contracts accounted for less than 1 percent of GRP in the Northeast Illinois Region.  Defense contracts in the Rockford and Greater Peoria regions are concentrated in a few industries. While contracts in the Rockford region are concentrated in electrical apparatus- equipment wholesale (55%) and aircraft manufacturing (20%), in the Greater Peoria region, they are heavily concentrated in machinery manufacturing (73%). Heavy concentration in a few industries may make these regions more vulnerable to reductions in defense spending as a result of either cuts in defense programs related to these industries or the regions losing their competitive advantage in those industries over time. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 6 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Population Illinois currently has an estimated 12,859,995 residents, making it the fifth largest state in the U.S. The state population grew approximately 2.0% from 2005 to 2015, a much slower rate than the nation as a whole, which grew nearly 9% during the same period (Table 1 and Figure 1). As discussed in the following pages, the relatively slow population growth rate in the state is reflected in employment and gross domestic product trends. Table 1: Population, 2005-2015 Year 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Change (2005-2015) Illinois 12,610,000 12,696000 12,797,000 12,862,000 12,890,000 12,860,000 2.0% United States 295,517,000 301,231,000 306,772,000 311,719,000 316,427,000 321,419,000 8.8% 2006 12,644,000 298,380,000 2008 12,747,000 304,094,000 2010 12,841,000 309,347,000 2012 12,875,000 314,103,000 2014 12,882,000 318,907,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 350,000,000 300,000,000 250,000,000 200,000,000 150,000,000 100,000,000 50,000,000 Figure 1: Population, 2005-2015 — 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Illinois U.S. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 7 Illinois U.S. State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Employment and Gross Domestic Product by Sectors Health care and social assistance is the largest industry by employment in Illinois. The health care sector employed more than 778,000 workers in 2015, approximately 13.3 percent of total employment in the state (Figure 2). After health care, retail trade and manufacturing are the two largest sectors. These three sectors together constituted more than one third of total state employment in 2015. These sectors are also dominant sectors at the national level. However, manufacturing accounts for a slightly larger share of employment in Illinois than in the U.S. (Table 2). The share of manufacturing in state employment is 10.0% while it is 8.8% of national employment. Similar to the pattern observed for the national economy, industries display different growth rates (Figure 3). Sectors that created the most jobs in the state from 2005 to 2015 were health care, accommodation and food services, and professional and technical services. These sectors respectively added 119,040; 60,858; and 56,870 jobs to the state economy. Manufacturing and construction experienced the largest job losses during the same period. From 2005 to 2015, manufacturing lost more than 110,000 jobs while the construction sector lost nearly 55,000 jobs in Illinois. Overall, state industries with relatively large employment shrank at a faster rate than the industries in the national economy or they did not grow as fast as the national industrial average. Educational services, 9.1% Manufacturing, 10.0% Retail trade, 10.5% Health care and social assistance, 13.3% Mining, 0.2% Agriculture, 0.3% Utilities, 0.4% Professional and technical services, 6.9% Wholesale trade, 5.2% Finance and insurance, 4.9% Transportation and warehousing, 4.8% Public administration, 4.4% Construction, 3.7% Other services, 3.5% Information, 1.9% Management of companies, 1.6% Arts, entertainment, and recreation, 1.4% Figure 2: Sectoral Distribution of Employment, 2015 Accommodation and food services, 8.4% Administrative and waste services, 7.3% Real estate, 1.3% University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 8 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Table 2: Top Industries by Employment, 2015 Industry Health care and social assistance Manufacturing Illinois Rank Employment Share 1 778,941 13.3% 3 582,196 10.0% 492,878 8.4% 403,699 6.9% 287,488 4.9% 260,142 4.4% 13 202,022 3.5% 15 94,566 1.6% 17 77,544 1.3% 19 17,830 0.3% 21 8,133 0.1% 5,811,911 99.4% 5,848,451 100.0% United States Rank Employment Share 1 20,282,539 14.5% 4 12,339,633 8.8% 3 13,030,233 9.3% Retail trade 2 615,216 10.5% 2 15,704,487 11.3% Educational services 4 534,856 9.1% 5 12,313,741 8.8% Accommodation and food services 5 Professional and technical services 7 Finance and insurance 9 Public administration 11 7 11 8 13 16 17 18 21 8,725,796 6.3% 5,770,137 4.1% 7,242,529 5.2% 4,348,055 3.1% 2,197,652 1.6% 2,136,255 1.5% 1,255,846 0.9% 240,460 0.2% 139,486,998 100.0% 139,491,699 100.0% Administrative and waste services 6 426,882 7.3% 6 8,874,589 6.4% Wholesale trade 8 301,313 5.2% 10 5,874,599 4.2% Transportation and warehousing 10 283,508 4.8% 12 5,542,106 4.0% Construction 12 215,002 3.7% 9 6,603,670 4.7% Other services, except public administration Management of companies and enterprises Real estate and rental and leasing Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting Unclassified Total with data suppression Total without data suppression Information 14 111,601 1.9% 14 2,897,488 2.1% Arts, entertainment, and recreation 16 84,672 1.4% 15 2,546,157 1.8% Utilities 18 24,134 0.4% 19 808,885 0.6% Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 20 9,288 0.2% 20 752,141 0.5% *Industries for which employment data is suppressed. Shares are calculated using total without data suppression. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 9 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% -10.0% -20.0% -30.0% State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Figure 3: Industry Employment Growth Rates, 2005-2015 University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber Illinois U.S. In terms of contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP), the largest industry in Illinois was finance, insurance, and real estate in 2015. This industry accounted for nearly 23 percent of Illinois GDP in 2015. The second largest industry was professional and business services, which accounted for 14 percent of Illinois GDP. The third largest industry was manufacturing, which accounted for 13 percent of Illinois GDP. This pattern is slightly different from the national economy in that the shares of these three industries in the U.S. GDP are smaller than in the state. This suggests that trends in these sectors largely determine the health and growth of the state economy. The real state GDP grew 6.8 percent from 2005 to 2015, lagging the national growth rate of 13.3 percent. The largest contributor to real GDP growth in Illinois was finance, insurance, real estate. This industry accounted for approximately 3 percentage points of the total growth in real GDP. The second largest contributor was professional and business services, which accounted for 2 percentage points of the total growth in real GDP. In 2015, Illinois had a per capita personal income (PCPI) of $50,295. This PCPI ranked 15th in the United States and was 105 percent of the national average ($48,112). The 2015 PCPI reflected an increase of 10 percent from 2005 (nearly the same as the change at the national level). In 2005, the PCPI of Illinois was $45,689 and ranked 16th in the United States. 10 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Table 3: Top Industries by Gross Domestic Product, 2015 (2009 million dollars) Industry Finance, insurance, and real estate Manufacturing Educational services and health care Retail trade Illinois Rank Employment 1 156,638 3 88,284 5 57,605 7 36,584 9 25,090 Share Rank 22.7 1 12.8 4 8.4 5 5.3 7 3.6 8 3.5 9 United States Employment Share 3,189,329 19.82 1,912,044 11.9 1,354,416 8.4 969,407 6.0 854,581 5.3 623,855 3.9 Professional and business services 2 97,517 14.1 3 2,039,290 12.7 Government and other services 4 82,183 11.9 2 2,289,596 14.2 Wholesale trade 6 53,394 7.7 6 983,610 6.1 Arts and entertainment 8 25,637 3.7 10 623,427 3.9 Information Construction Agriculture Total 690,187 Transportation and warehousing 10 24,047 3.5 11 445,820 2.8 11 23,978 13 4,700 0.7 14 146,405 0.9 100.0 16,088,249 100.0 Utilities 12 11,840 1.7 13 264,359 1.6 Mining and oil extraction 14 2,690 0.4 12 392,110 2.4 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 18,000,000 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 Figure 4: Gross Domestic Product, 2005-2015 — 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Illinois U.S. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 11 Illinois, in million dollars (2009) U.S., in million dollars (2009) State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 – Figure 5: Per capita Personal Income, 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Illinois U.S. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 12 2015 Constant dollars Year 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Change (2005-2015) Illinois 5,748,355 5,869,157 5,551,930 5,566,648 5,687,541 5,848,451 1.7% United States 131,571,623 135,366,106 128,607,842 129,411,095 133,968,434 139,491,699 6.0% State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Trends in Employment, Unemployment, and Initial Unemployment Insurance Claims For both the state and the country, 2010 marks the lowest level of employment in the last ten years. Unlike nationwide, state employment has not yet reached its pre-recession level, though the state economy continues to expand. (Table 4). Differences in employment growth can also be seen in Figure 6 where employment levels for Illinois and the U.S. are shown as shares of 2005 employment. Table 4: Employment, 2005-2015 2006 5,821,022 133,833,834 2008 5,841,692 134,805,659 2010 5,502,322 127,820,442 2012 5,636,918 131,696,378 2014 5,762,156 136,613,609 1.10 1.05 1.00 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 Figure 6: Indexed Employment, 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Illinois U.S. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 13 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Current unemployment rate in the state (5.9%) is slightly higher than the national unemployment rate (5.3%). After rising sharply during the recession years of 2009 and 2010, the unemployment rate has fallen in recent years. However, it is still higher than pre-recession levels (Table 5 and Figure 7). Table 5: Unemployment Rate (%), 2005-2015 2005 2006 Illinois 5.7 4.5 U.S. 5.1 4.6 2007 2008 2009 5.0 6.3 10.2 4.6 5.8 9.3 2010 2011 10.4 9.7 9.6 8.9 2012 2013 2014 2015 9.0 9.1 7.1 5.9 8.1 7.4 6.2 5.3 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Figure 7: Annual Unemployment Rate, 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Illinois 2011 2012 2013 U.S. 2014 2015 After peaking during the recession (2009), recent unemployment insurance claims in the state have 3 returned to below their pre-recession levels. Overall, the trend for the state is very similar to trends observed for the U.S. Similar to the national trends, the state experienced a higher number of claims during the recession years of 2008, 2009, and 2010, but the most recent claims are below pre-recession levels. In Figure 8, initial unemployment claims for Illinois and the U.S. are shown as a share of 2006 initial unemployment claims. Current initial claims in the state have returned to their pre-recession levels in 2014 and below the pre-recession level in 2015. 3 are a leading indicator of economic conditions and are used in the New claims anticipate subsequent movement in the economy, Initial unemployment insurance claims analysis of current unemployment trends. primarily measuring University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber emerging unemployment. 14 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 Figure 8: Average Weekly Unemployment Insurance Claims, 2005- 2015 — 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Illinois U.S. 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Figure 9: Indexed Unemployment Insurance Claims, 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Illinois U.S. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 15 Illinois United States State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Trends in Private Sector Employment and Establishments Although the overall level of volatility in the labor market in Illinois appears to be largely the same as in the U.S., private sector establishments created more new net jobs at the national level than in the state in the last decade (relative to baseline). While the births of new establishments were offset by the deaths of existing establishments in the state, private sector establishments continue 4 to increase in net numbers in the country (Figures 10, 11, 12, 13). 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 – Figure 10: Private sector job gains and losses, Illinois, 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Gains 2011 2012 Losses 2013 2014 2015 2016 4 Quarterly statistics in private sector establishment and employment helps assess the business cycle, the level of labor market volatility, and the effect of establishment employment changes on aggregate employment. These data are also useful in highlighting the forces behind the net changes in employment. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 16 March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 Figure 11: Private sector job gains and losses, U.S., 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Gains 2010 2011 2012 Losses 2013 2014 2015 2016 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Figure 12: Private sector establishment births and deaths, Illinois, 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Births 2011 2012 Deaths 2013 2014 2015 2016 University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 17 March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 – Figure 13: Private sector establishment births and deaths, U.S., 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Births 2010 2011 2012 Deaths 2013 2014 2015 2016 University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 18 March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March September March State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Annual Wages The current average wage for all industries in the state is $55,889 (2015). This figure is above the national figure (according to BLS 2015 estimates, average annual wage for all industries was 5 $52,942 in the U.S.). Figure 15 examines average annual wages for just the manufacturing sector. Different trends are observed in terms of changes in wages for the economy as a whole and the manufacturing sector. While the average annual wages for all industries have been stable both at the state and national levels, the annual wages for the manufacturing sector have risen notably. Another observation is that while the state wage average for the manufacturing sector has been closer to the national average (relative to the wages for the economy as a whole), wages in the manufacturing sector in Illinois are increasing slightly higher than the U.S. Figure 14 depicts average annual wages for the economy as a whole while 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 – Figure 14: Annual Average Wages, 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Illinois 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 U.S. 5 Annual wages are a key to understanding what the standard of living is in the local economy. Earnings from employment in the form of wages remain the primary source of income for individuals to support themselves and their families. Industry-level annual wages are also considered as an indicator of a state’s competitiveness. All monetary figures are in 2015 dollars. Previous year wages are adjusted for inflation using Consumer Price Index (CPI) deflators published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 19 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 – Figure 15: Annual Average Wages in Manufacturing Sector, 2005- 2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Illinois 2011 2012 U.S. 2013 2014 2015 The following three graphs examine average wages for three sectors that drive the state economy: health care; accommodation and food services; and professional and technical services. While average wages in the first two sectors are very close to national averages, the state wage average for professional and technical services is higher than the national average. It is worth noting, however, that the difference between state and national wage averages for professional services appears to be getting smaller over time. 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 – Figure 16: Annual Average Wages in Health Care Sector, 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Illinois 2011 2012 U.S. 2013 2014 2015 University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 20 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 – Figure 17: Annual Average Wages in Accommodation and Food Service Sector, 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Illinois 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 U.S. 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 – Figure 18: Annual Average Wages in Professional and Technical Services Sector, 2005-2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Illinois 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 U.S. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 21 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Local Industrial Concentration  Ten out of thirty-two locally concentrated industry sectors are manufacturing sectors (a reflection of the fact that manufacturing accounts for 10% of local employment) (Table 6). The following three industries and businesses operating in these industries are either performing defense related contract work or are part of the defense industry supply chain: machinery manufacturing (NAICS 333); fabricated metal products manufacturing (NAICS 332); professional and technical services (NAICS 541). Among these locally concentrated industries, the professional and technical services industry is a major source of employment in the state, accounting for approximately 7% of total statewide employment in 2015.  Many of the industries (except those indicated with symbol † below) are locally concentrated based on both employment and establishment counts. For these industries, local employment per establishment is close the equivalent national ratio. For instance, the employment-to- establishment ratio for fabricated metal products manufacturing (NAICS 332) is 27 in the state while it is 25 at the national level. The average size of establishments may have implications for the strength of the state’s relationship with defense industry and prospects of growth. Industries that are heavily concentrated within large firms may wield greater political or supply chain power. Yet this may also mean the local strength and health of the industry is dependent on the fortunes of just a few firms, often businesses that are not owned or led locally. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 22 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Table 6: Concentrated Industry Sectors: Employment-Based LQs6 NAICS Code 333 323 326 813 519 523 425 322 482 488 484 331 561 522 446 541 Industry State U.S. LQ 481 Air transportation 34,771 457,788 1.81 Machinery manufacturing Printing and related support activities Plastics and rubber products manufacturing Membership associations and organizations Other information services Securities, commodity contracts, investments Electronic markets and agents and brokers Paper manufacturing Rail transportation Support activities for transportation Truck transportation Primary metal manufacturing Administrative and support services Credit intermediation and related activities† Health and personal care stores† 75,997 1,115,478 1.62 27,007 451,227 1.43 40,779 686,517 1.42 79,713 1,365,167 1.39 21,538 378,206 1.36 51,018 903,933 1.35 47,633 911,685 1.25 19,304 371,234 1.24 38 745 1.22 36,031 724,182 1.19 71,655 1,444,317 1.18 19,361 392,441 1.18 411,742 8,445,060 1.16 121,562 2,573,457 1.13 47,943 1,031,294 1.11 403,699 8,725,796 1.10 5,811,911 139,486,998 N.A. 5,848,451 139,491,699 N.A. 332 Fabricated metal product manufacturing 94,833 1,456,264 1.55 335 Electrical equipment and appliance mfg. 22,817 381,635 1.43 493 Warehousing and storage† 49,129 831,905 1.41 325 Chemical manufacturing 46,345 806,111 1.37 485 Transit and ground passenger transportation 41,060 724,453 1.35 424 Merchant wholesalers, nondurable goods 108,290 2,030,897 1.27 311 Food manufacturing 78,809 1,509,267 1.25 324 Petroleum and coal products manufacturing 5,628 109,715 1.22 524 Insurance carriers and related activities 113,032 2,266,509 1.19 713 Amusements, gambling, and recreation 91,445 1,838,671 1.19 423 Merchant wholesalers, durable goods 145,390 2,932,016 1.18 339 Miscellaneous manufacturing 28,832 587,713 1.17 921 Executive, legislative and general government 145,549 2,998,048 1.16 491 Postal service† 28,310 602,924 1.12 443 Electronics and appliance stores† 23,925 515,063 1.11 Professional and technical services Total Employment with Data Suppression Total Employment without Data Suppression 6 Note that locally concentrated industries are identified in this analysis by LQs exceeding 1.10. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 23 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Given their size in the state economy and potential supply-chain linkages to the defense industry, the following figures examine state employment levels in these industries in comparison with national trends. State employment in machinery manufacturing declined substantially during the recession years and has not fully recovered (Figure 19). Similarly, state employment in fabricated metal product manufacturing declined considerably during the recession and has not completely recovered. While national employment increased in the last five years, state employment remained the same (Figure 20). State employment in professional and technical services closely follows the national trend and surpassed the pre-recession levels (Figure 21). Figure 19: Employment in Machinery Manufacturing, 2005-2015 100,000 1,400,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 — 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Illinois U.S. 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 Figure 20: Employment in Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing, 2005-2015 — 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Illinois U.S. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 24 Illinois Employment Illinois Employment U.S. Employment U.S. Employment State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 Figure 21: Employment in Professional and Technical Services, 2005-2015 — 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Illinois U.S. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 25 Illinois Employment U.S. Employment State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Components of State Employment Growth    The state economy is not performing as well as the national economy. The national growth component (national shift in the box below) shows that, if the state’s economic growth rate were identical to that of the national economy, then the number of jobs in the state should have grown by 346,028 between 2005 and 2015. However, the state gained 100,096 jobs from 2005 to 2015. The industry mix component of 1,663 means that the state has 1,663 more jobs than it would have if its structure were identical to the nation. This figure is minimal compared to the other components, implying that the state industrial composition does not generate differences in growth from the nation. According to the local share component, a shift of -247,594 jobs in the state is attributable to its relative competitive position. That is, a loss of nearly two hundred forty-seven thousand jobs is attributable to characteristics specific to the local economy. National Shift (RS) = 346,028 Industry Mix (IM) = 1,663 Local (Competitive) Shift (LS) = -247,594  Figure 22 below graphically summarizes the results for individual industries. In this graph, the location quotient (the employment concentration relative to the nation) appears on the vertical axis and the local component of the change in employment from 2005 to 2015 appears on the horizontal axis. The size of the circles represents current employment levels. Industries that appear in the upper right quadrant (high LQ-high competitive shift) represent solid strengths. For example, educational services and information are both locally concentrated and local factors, specific to the state of Illinois, contributed to the growth of the industry.  Industries that appear in the upper left quadrant (high LQ-low competitive shift) represent current industrial strengths that are struggling. Manufacturing and construction are located in this quadrant. Negative competitive shifts mean that these industries are not a negative competitive shift for this industry indicates that it is declining faster locally than nationally.  Industries that appear in the lower right quadrant (low LQ-high competitive shift) represent potential emerging local industrial strengths. Although they are growing faster than national industry trends suggest, these industries are relatively small and are not expected to continue growing in the future. growing locally faster than the national industrial average. Positive competitive shifts suggest that growing at the same rate as the national industrial average. In fact, because employment in manufacturing is declining at the national level, University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 26 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile  The lower left quadrant (low LQ-low competitive shift) is the least interesting of the four quadrants. Industries that appear in this quadrant are not locally concentrated and the local economy does not exhibit a competitive advantage to support employment growth in these sectors.  In order to see the quadrant locations for industries at a fine-grained level, Figure 23 replicates the information from Figure 22 with 3-digit NAICS industries but excluding outliers (industries with LQ > 2 or competitive shift > 50%) and without displaying industry size. According to Figure 20, the greatest number of industries are located in the upper and lower left quadrants. However, a considerable number of industries are located in the upper right quadrant of the graph. Industries such as electronic markets and agents and brokers (NAICS 425), air transportation (NAICS 481), and support activities for transportation (NAICS 488) represent solid strengths while apparel manufacturing (NAICS 315) and transportation equipment manufacturing (NAICS 336) show emerging local industrial strengths. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 27 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Figure 22: Regional Concentration and Regional Effects Construction struction Manufacturing -30% -20% -10% 1.60 LQ Con 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 CS -50% -40% 0% 10% 20% Utilities University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 28 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Figure 23: Regional Concentration and Regional Effects -50% -40% -30% 454 312 512 -20% 926-10% 442 511 444574282 611623 551 446 812 712811 1 532 CS 40% 50% 923 922 721 483 315 924 928 316 449425 441 453 624 238 711 531 327 452 518 999 486 0.5 113 525 0 211 -0.5 -1 331 921 339 561 517 522 491 443 2 LQ Co 333 332 1.5 485 335 323 813 nstruction 481 523 493 326 325 424 423 541 713 322 484 488 311 324 10% 20% 30% 524 451 562 621 482 515 447 533 622 212 233634492 337 221 0% 487 111 321 237314 336 115 114 213 521 313 112 425 University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 29 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Occupations There are four major growth occupation groups: Business and financial operations occupations; Architecture and engineering occupations; Sales occupations; and Construction and extraction occupations (Table 7). Occupation groups with increased occupational employment LQ values over time indicate that industries that demand these occupations are probably growing and might demand equivalent or similar occupations in the future (Table 8). Understanding the current and changing occupation mix of a state informs policy makers and analysts about occupational requirements of local industries. Specifically, they could inform educational and workforce training policies and programs for growing and/or specialized industries. For example, employment growth in professional and technical services (NAICS 541) discussed above is probably related to growth in architecture and engineering occupations. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 30 Table 7: Changes in Major Occupation Groups in Illinois, 2010-2015 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Illinois 2015 Change 388,500 29.5% 169,580 33.3% 32,760 -3.5% 46,920 7.0% 68,810 -1.7% 159,210 3.1% 482,170 9.2% 168,830 31.6% 919,450 4.4% 178,580 -13.3% 437,840 5.8% 473,270 9.2% U.S. Occ. Code 13-0000 17-0000 21-0000 25-0000 29-0000 33-0000 37-0000 41-0000 45-0000 49-0000 53-0000 00-0000 Occupation Title Business and Financial Operations Occupations Architecture and Engineering Occupations Community and Social Service Occupations Education, Training, and Library Occupations Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations Protective Service Occupations Building and Grounds Cleaning and Main. Occ. Sales and Related Occupations Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations Transportation and Material Moving Occupations All Occupations 2010 299,890 127,260 33,940 43,850 69,980 154,460 441,480 128,310 880,460 205,920 413,970 433,260 2010 6,022,860 3,283,950 1,064,510 992,650 1,716,640 3,962,930 11,027,340 3,425,220 21,503,800 5,072,530 8,236,340 8,547,980 2015 6,936,990 4,005,250 1,146,110 1,062,370 1,843,600 3,989,910 12,577,080 4,307,500 21,846,420 5,477,820 9,073,290 9,536,610 Change 15.2% 22.0% 7.7% 7.0% 7.4% 0.7% 14.1% 25.8% 1.6% 8.0% 10.2% 11.6% 11-0000 Management Occupations 5,528,420 5,852,710 5.9% 127,097,160 137,896,660 8.5% 15-0000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations 313,360 316,070 0.9% 6,090,910 7,032,560 15.5% 19-0000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations 83,630 87,700 4.9% 2,305,530 2,475,390 7.4% 23-0000 Legal Occupations 74,910 74,620 -0.4% 1,901,180 1,972,140 3.7% 27-0000 Arts, Design, Entertain., Sports, and Media Occ. 405,940 385,700 -5.0% 8,457,870 8,542,670 1.0% 31-0000 Healthcare Support Occupations 320,770 332,380 3.6% 7,346,580 8,021,800 9.2% 35-0000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations 140,030 150,250 7.3% 3,187,810 3,351,620 5.1% 39-0000 Personal Care and Service Occupations 184,030 178,810 -2.8% 4,175,550 4,407,050 5.5% 43-0000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations 583,370 593,750 1.8% 13,437,980 14,462,120 7.6% 47-0000 Construction and Extraction Occupations 5,170 7,580 46.6% 408,040 454,230 11.3% 51-0000 Production Occupations 184,440 199,930 8.4% 4,928,960 5,374,150 9.0% University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 31 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Table 8: Occupational Employment Location Quotients, Illinois, 2015* Occ. Code Occupation Title 2010 2015 1.15 1.32 0.89 1.00 0.73 0.67 1.02 1.04 0.94 0.88 0.90 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.86 0.92 0.94 0.99 0.93 0.77 1.16 1.14 1.17 1.17 11-0000 Management Occupations 1.00 1.00 13-0000 Business and Financial Operations Occupations 17-0000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations 21-0000 Community and Social Service Occupations 25-0000 Education, Training, and Library Occupations 29-0000 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations 33-0000 Protective Service Occupations 37-0000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occ. 41-0000 Sales and Related Occupations 45-0000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations 49-0000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations 53-0000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations 00-0000 All Occupations *Reference region in LQ calculations is U.S. 15-0000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations 1.18 1.06 19-0000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations 0.83 0.83 23-0000 Legal Occupations 0.91 0.89 27-0000 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occ. 1.10 1.06 31-0000 Healthcare Support Occupations 1.00 0.98 35-0000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations 1.01 1.06 39-0000 Personal Care and Service Occupations 1.01 0.96 43-0000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations 1.00 0.97 47-0000 Construction and Extraction Occupations 0.29 0.39 51-0000 Production Occupations 0.86 0.88 Looking at median annual wages for the state and the country, there do not seem to be large differences for different occupation groups. Regarding change over time, median wages declined at a greater rate in the state than in the U.S. (-2.1% versus -1.6%). While wages for workers with three occupations grew locally faster than the national average (computer occupations; protective service occupations; and construction occupations), for three other occupation groups, wages declined substantially compared to the national trend for that occupation (life and physical science occupations; legal occupations, and farming occupations). University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 32 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Table 9: Annual Median Wages for Major Occupational Groups (in 2015 constant dollars), 2010-2015 Occ. Code 13-0000 17-0000 21-0000 25-0000 29-0000 33-0000 37-0000 41-0000 45-0000 49-0000 53-0000 00-0000 Occupation Title Business and Financial Operations Occupations Architecture and Engineering Occupations Community and Social Service Occupations Education, Training, and Library Occupations Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations Protective Service Occupations Building and Grounds Cleaning and Main. Occ. Sales and Related Occupations Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations Transportation and Material Moving Occupations All Occupations Illinois 2010 2015 Change 2010 64,989 64,800 -0.3% 65,946 74,239 74,700 0.6% 76,750 43,272 42,100 -2.7% 42,696 53,098 48,950 -7.8% 49,663 63,870 61,680 -3.4% 63,576 41,565 42,060 1.2% 39,848 25,185 25,580 1.6% 24,446 26,641 26,120 -2.0% 26,489 29,761 27,270 -8.4% 21,337 46,543 46,130 -0.9% 43,609 30,870 30,360 -1.7% 30,870 38,130 37,320 -2.1% 36,783 U.S. 2015 Change 65,710 -0.4% 76,870 0.2% 42,010 -1.6% 47,220 -4.9% 62,610 -1.5% 37,730 -5.3% 23,860 -2.4% 25,660 -3.1% 21,760 2.0% 42,790 -1.9% 30,090 -2.5% 36,200 -1.6% 11-0000 Management Occupations 94,837 93,910 -1.0% 99,391 98,560 -0.8% 15-0000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations 78,250 80,170 2.5% 80,130 81,430 1.6% 19-0000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations 71,163 64,850 -8.9% 63,620 62,160 -2.3% 23-0000 Legal Occupations 95,152 76,620 -19.5% 81,065 78,170 -3.6% 27-0000 Arts, Design, Entertain., Sports, and Media Occ. 45,500 45,780 0.6% 46,598 46,160 -0.9% 31-0000 Healthcare Support Occupations 26,413 26,670 1.0% 26,913 27,040 0.5% 35-0000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations 20,543 19,430 -5.4% 20,402 19,580 -4.0% 39-0000 Personal Care and Service Occupations 22,446 22,410 -0.2% 22,435 21,850 -2.6% 43-0000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations 34,120 33,680 -1.3% 33,380 33,200 -0.5% 47-0000 Construction and Extraction Occupations 59,326 61,160 3.1% 42,478 42,280 -0.5% 51-0000 Production Occupations 33,391 32,500 -2.7% 32,967 32,250 -2.2% University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 33 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile International Trade Exports sustain thousands of businesses and support hundreds of thousands of jobs in Illinois. According to the International Trade Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce, in 2015, a total of 23,252 companies exported from Illinois locations, and exports from those companies supported 333,674 jobs (nearly 6% of total employment). Eighty-six percent (86%) of these jobs are attributable to manufactured goods exports. Major export categories are machinery, chemicals, transportation equipment, electronic products, and electrical equipment. Illinois’s top five (5) export markets were Canada ($17.5 billion), Mexico ($9.1 billion), China ($4.9 billion), Germany ($3.1 billion), and Australia ($2.6 billion) in 2015. Similar to the trend observed for the nation as a whole, after rising sharply following the end of the recession in 2010, exports have declined in recent years (Figure 24). Illinois’s share of U.S. exports is shrinking in recent years (Table 10). This is explained in part by the state’s contracting manufacturing sector, and the decline in the state’s share of share of the U.S. population. 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 Figure 24: Exports Originated from Illinois, 2007-2016 (2016 constant million dollars) — 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Illinois U.S. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 34 Illinois United States State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, State Economic Profile Table 10: Top Products Exported from Illinois and Illinois’s Shares of U.S. Exports, 2013-2016 (2016 constant dollars) NAICS Code 120190 870324 901890 851712 230330 870410 853710 840999 870323 848180 210690 850440 Product Description Soybeans Passenger vehicles Industrial appliance for medical surgical dental and veterinary products Phones for cellular ntwks. / for other wireless eq. Brewing or distilling dregs and waste Dumpers designed for off-highway use Controls, elect apparatus f elect cont. Spark-ignition reciprocating int. com Passenger vehicle spk-ig int. com rcpr. p eng. >1500 Taps cocks etc. f pipe vat inc. thermos. control Food preparations Static converters; adp. power supplies Sub-total (Top 25) Export ($ million) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2,214 1,818 1,545 2,375 1,368 1,611 1,595 1,090 870 914 1,021 1,065 318 656 847 886 1,119 811 709 643 2,585 1,810 1,084 602 575 586 510 560 620 657 561 531 1,008 933 877 498 370 475 464 417 321 317 350 387 459 425 433 375 22,176 23,630 21,563 20,171 Share 2013 2014 2015 2016 3.3 2.7 2.4 4.0 2.1 2.4 2.5 1.8 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.8 0.5 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.2 1.1 1.1 3.9 2.6 1.7 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.5 1.4 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 33.5 34.5 34.0 33.7 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 % Change, 2013-2016 7.3 (20.4) 22.5 179.0 (42.5) (76.7) (2.7) (14.3) (50.6) 12.7 20.7 (18.4) (9.0) (9.7) 271012 Lt oils, preps gt 70% petroleum 3,931 5,059 2,648 2,838 5.9 7.4 4.2 4.7 (27.8) 300490 Medicaments, measured doses, retail pk. 378 550 1,031 1,217 0.6 0.8 1.6 2.0 221.8 880000 Civilian aircraft, engines, and parts 904 948 1,010 1,067 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.8 18.1 851762 Machinery for recp./convr./trans/regn. of voice/image 527 736 801 998 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.7 89.3 870899 Parts and accessories of motor vehicles 892 940 832 745 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.2 (16.4) 300210 Antisera, blood fractions & immunological products 526 555 1,050 615 0.8 0.8 1.7 1.0 16.9 851770 Parts of phone sets 214 327 777 593 0.3 0.5 1.2 1.0 177.1 843149 Parts and attachments for derricks 688 755 610 546 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.9 (20.7) 100590 Corn (maize), other than seed corn 658 1,008 709 507 1.0 1.5 1.1 0.8 (22.9) 842951 Mechanical front-end shovel loaders 659 583 586 456 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 (30.8) 381121 Additive for lub. oil cont. petro/bituminous mi 420 441 442 409 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 (2.6) 382200 Composite diagnostic/lab reagents, exc. pharma 427 392 448 383 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 (10.3) 284410 Natural uranium & compounds, alloys & ceramic 126 324 623 369 0.2 0.5 1.0 0.6 193.2 Total 66,213 68,394 63,421 59,808 University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 35 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, Northeast Illinois State Economic Composition and Change Department of Defense Contracts Trends in Defense Spending in the U.S. In FY 2015, the Department of Defense (DoD) spent $408 billion on payroll and contracts in the United States, which corresponds to approximately 2.3% of U.S. GDP. Of this amount, $134.8 billion were on personnel and $273.5 billion were on contracts. Defense contracts spending has declined in recent years (Figure 25). From FY 2012 to 2013, DoD contract spending in the United States declined from $320.4 billion to $302.6 billion; in FY 2014 it further decreased to $281.8 billion before falling to $273.5 billion in FY 2015. In FY 2015, contract spending occurred in four major items: $129.8 were in supplies and equipment (47%), $104 were in services (38%), $28.9 were in research and development (11%), and $10.9 were in construction (4%). 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Figure 25: DoD Contract Spending in the U.S. (in current dollars) 336.8 335.9 331.4 320.4 302.6 311.7 281.8 273.5 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Trends in Defense Spending in Illinois According to defense spending data measured based on the time of performance of contracts, $7.0 billion were spent in the state in 2015 (up from $5.6 billion in 2014). Of that amount, $129.8 were in supplies and equipment (64%); $104 were in services (24%); $28.9 were in research and development (6%); $10.9 were in construction (6%); $2.2 billion were on personnel and $4.2 billion on construction (Defense Spending by State Fiscal Year 2015). DoD purchases in Illinois is more concentrated on manufactured products than from other states. Compared to the distribution of spending at the national level, defense spending in Illinois is concentrated in supplies and equipment, an indication that manufacturing firms rely more on DoD contracts than non- manufacturing firms. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 36 State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, Northeast Illinois State Economic Composition and Change According to defense spending data estimated based on dollars obligated, $5.3 billion were pent in the state in 2015 (up from $3.2 billion in 2014). Based on this estimate, since 2006, the Department of Defense has spent at least $3 billion dollars in contracts annually in Illinois (Figure 7 23). Although these contracts constitute around 1 percent of the gross state product (which is substantially less than in many other states), they support a large industrial base and are crucial for local businesses in certain industries (Table 11). Overall, the number of DoD contracts performed in the state closely tracks the national trend. However, it is worth noting that the state’s share in national defense spending appears to be trending higher in recent years; such is the case between 2013 and 2015 when contracts performed in Illinois increased from $3.2 billion to $5.3 billion. 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 Figure 26: Department of Defense Contracts by Place of Performance, 2006-2015 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Illinois U.S. Of the $5.3 billion worth of DoD contracts performed in Illinois in 2015, the most contract dollars were received by businesses operating in manufacturing, wholesale trade, construction, and professional and technical services (Table 11). The top five industries include: Medical equipment merchant wholesalers (NAICS 423450); Construction (NAICS 237990); Search, detection, and navigation instruments (NAICS 334511); Heavy duty truck manufacturing (NAICS 336120); Engineering services (NAICS 541330); and Aircraft manufacturing (NAICS 336411). As discussed above, businesses in professional and technical services (NAICS 541), fabricated metal product manufacturing (NAICS 332), and machinery manufacturing (NAICS 333) appear to be carrying out a substantial portion of DoD contracts performed in the state. 7 Contracts spending data are not adjusted for inflation. Data are derived from USASpending.gov, which is a publicly available, searchable website operated by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service. Note that these figures for the regions could be a low-end or a high-end tally of contracting dollars because the data source includes only direct contracts and not subcontracts. University of Illinois, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center, Quad Cities Chamber 37 Illinois (current milions of dollars) U.S. (current millions of dollars) State of Illinois Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Program, Northeast Illinois State Economic Composition and Change Table 11: Illinois Industries with DoD Prime Contracts Valued $50 million or more, Fiscal Year 2015 NAICS Code 237990 336120 336411 423610 236220 541512 332992 517110 334111 424210 541519 423850 541511 Industry Other heavy construction Heavy duty truck manufacturing Aircraft manufacturing Elec. equip. and wiring merchant wholesalers Commercial building construction Computer systems design services Small arms ammunition manufacturing Wired telecommunications carriers Electronic computer manufacturing Druggists’ goods merchant wholesalers Other computer related services Service estab. equip. merchant wholesalers Custom computer programming services Sum of dollars Share obligated (%) 386,564,251 7.3 378,625,020 7.1 223,485,645 4.2 168,727,634 3.2 160,973,062 3.0 131,877,825 2.5 107,680,828 2.0 102,663,586 1.9 92,287,588 1.7 80,933,559 1.5 77,835,610 1.5 70,519,423 1.3 59,748,225 1.1 423450 Medical equipment merchant wholesalers 471,925,182 8.9 334511 Search, detection, and navigation instruments 383,627,578 7.2 541330 Engineering services 229,129,896 4.3 541712 Other physical and biological research 181,012,797 3.4 324110 Petroleum refineries 161,238,789 3.0 334419 Other electronic component manufacturing 153,326,575 2.9 332993 Ammunition, except sma

static1.squarespace.com/static/5685a7e8a12f44306f7879bf/t/592465fd5016e128c831daab/1495557632663/DIA+State+Economic+Profile_April+2017.pdf

The Shadow Government – Organization Chart – Powers That Beat ©️ 2020. THIS LIST IS ALSO THE ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE BLOCKCHAIN INITIATIVE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX PARTNERS AND AEROSPACE AGENCIES

EDITORIAL THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT    1. The Executive Branch        Council on Foreign Relations        Trilateral Commission        The Bilderberg Group        National Security Council        Joint Chiefs of Staff        National Program Office        Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)    2. Intelligence Branch        National Security Agency (NSA)        National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)        National Reconnaissance Organization        Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)        Federal Bureau of Investigation, CounterContinue reading “The Shadow Government – Organization Chart – Powers That Beat ©️ 2020. THIS LIST IS ALSO THE ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE BLOCKCHAIN INITIATIVE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX PARTNERS AND AEROSPACE AGENCIES”

The Shadow Government – Organization Chart – Powers That Beat ©️ 2020

EDITORIAL THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT    1. The Executive Branch        Council on Foreign Relations        Trilateral Commission        The Bilderberg Group        National Security Council        Joint Chiefs of Staff        National Program Office        Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)    2. Intelligence Branch        National Security Agency (NSA)        National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)        National Reconnaissance Organization        Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)        Federal Bureau of Investigation, CounterContinue reading “The Shadow Government – Organization Chart – Powers That Beat ©️ 2020”

DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS (DEW) or ELECTROMAGNETIC FREQUENCY WAVES (EMF) ARE USED TO REMOTELY HACK & MIMIC OR “ENGINEER” ILLNESS FREQUENCIES OF HEART PALPITATIONS, PANIC ATTACKS, ANEURYSMS, HEART ATTACKS, FLU LIKE SYMPTOMS, NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS OF HEADACHES, VERTIGO, DIZZINESS, NAUSEA, DEPRESSION, FATIGUE, SEIZURES, STROKES, etc.; CARDIAC PALPITATIONS, AREHYTTMIA, chest pain, shortness of breath , etc.; RESPIRATORY ILLNESS ASTHMA, pneumonia, bronchitis,ETC; DERMATOLOGICAL skin rash, itching, burning, facial flush, etc.; OPTHALMOLOGIC ILLNESSES pain or burning in eyes, pressure in/behind the eyes, deteriorating vision, floaters, cataracts, etc; DIGESTIVE OROBLEMS, abdominal pain, enlarged thyroid, testicular/ovarian pain, dryness of eyes lips tongue mouth, thirsty ness, dehydration, nosebleeds, intenal bleeding, altered sugar levels, immune abnormalities, redistribution of metals in the body, hair loss, teeth pain, deteriorating feelings, impaired sense of smell, tinnier

OHCHR | Call for submissions on Psychological Torture and Ill-Treatment. Call for input to a report: Psychosocial dynamics conducive to torture and ill-treatment Deadline: 21 June 2020 Issued by: Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Purpose: To inform the Special Rapporteur’s annual interim report to be presented to the General Assembly at its 75th Session in October 2020 Background Pursuant to General Assembly resolution 74/143, the Special Rapporteur is mandated to submit an annual interim report to the third committee. Objectives of the report on Psychosocial Dynamics conducive to torture and ill-treatment The report aims to explore some of the predominant psychosocial dynamics which, in practice, tend to undermine, circumvent or even paralyse institutional checks and balances, thereby creating environments of unchecked power conducive not only to corruption but also to torture and ill-treatment. The larger purpose of the report is to show that the widespread practice of torture and ill-treatment, as well as societal acquiescence or support for such abuse, are deeply rooted in collective psychosocial behavioural patterns, which either remain largely unconscious to the human mind, or are based on fundamentally flawed rationalizations and severely distorted perceptions of reality. Relevant phenomena include patterns such as ‘system justification’, ‘wilful ignorance’, ‘bystander apathy’, ‘diffusion of responsibility’, ‘obedience’, ‘utilitarian moral disengagement’ and ‘group based moral disengagement’. Key questions and types of input sought The upcoming report aims to demonstrate that torture and other forms of ill-treatment cannot be effectively eradicated in any governance system failing to fully acknowledge and rigorously mitigate the corrosive effect of such psychosocial dynamics through normative, institutional and policy measures ensuring full transparency and strict accountability for all exercise of governmental power. With a view to ensuring the broadest possible consultations despite the worldwide COVID-19 crisis, the Special Rapporteur invites electronic submissions from States, civil society, experts and other stakeholders, both on the relevant psychosocial dynamics conducive to torture and ill-treatment and on recommended normative, institutional and policy measures of prevention and mitigation. How and where to submit inputs

Your search WHAT ARE HUMAN RIGHTS? DONATE HOME ABOUT US ISSUES HUMAN RIGHTS BY COUNTRY WHERE WE WORK HUMAN RIGHTS BODIES NEWS AND EVENTS PUBLICATIONS AND RESOURCES English > Your Human Rights > Torture > SRTorture > Call for submissions on Psychological Torture and Ill-Treatment Call for input to a report: Psychosocial dynamics conducive toContinue reading “OHCHR | Call for submissions on Psychological Torture and Ill-Treatment. Call for input to a report: Psychosocial dynamics conducive to torture and ill-treatment Deadline: 21 June 2020 Issued by: Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Purpose: To inform the Special Rapporteur’s annual interim report to be presented to the General Assembly at its 75th Session in October 2020 Background Pursuant to General Assembly resolution 74/143, the Special Rapporteur is mandated to submit an annual interim report to the third committee. Objectives of the report on Psychosocial Dynamics conducive to torture and ill-treatment The report aims to explore some of the predominant psychosocial dynamics which, in practice, tend to undermine, circumvent or even paralyse institutional checks and balances, thereby creating environments of unchecked power conducive not only to corruption but also to torture and ill-treatment. The larger purpose of the report is to show that the widespread practice of torture and ill-treatment, as well as societal acquiescence or support for such abuse, are deeply rooted in collective psychosocial behavioural patterns, which either remain largely unconscious to the human mind, or are based on fundamentally flawed rationalizations and severely distorted perceptions of reality. Relevant phenomena include patterns such as ‘system justification’, ‘wilful ignorance’, ‘bystander apathy’, ‘diffusion of responsibility’, ‘obedience’, ‘utilitarian moral disengagement’ and ‘group based moral disengagement’. Key questions and types of input sought The upcoming report aims to demonstrate that torture and other forms of ill-treatment cannot be effectively eradicated in any governance system failing to fully acknowledge and rigorously mitigate the corrosive effect of such psychosocial dynamics through normative, institutional and policy measures ensuring full transparency and strict accountability for all exercise of governmental power. With a view to ensuring the broadest possible consultations despite the worldwide COVID-19 crisis, the Special Rapporteur invites electronic submissions from States, civil society, experts and other stakeholders, both on the relevant psychosocial dynamics conducive to torture and ill-treatment and on recommended normative, institutional and policy measures of prevention and mitigation. How and where to submit inputs”

Emerging disruptive technologies, including artificial intelligence, machine learning, quantum computing, and neuroscience will dramatically alter the global security environment. PRISM V.8,N.3 “Singularity” maps this evolving challenge and propose solutions. Click here to read the latest issue → PRISM, NDU’s journal of complex operations, promotes informed discourse among national and international security professionals concerning our complex global security environment and whole-of-community efforts to meet longstanding and emerging challenges.

ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/prism/prism_8-3/prism_8-3.pdf

DELOITTE MILITARY READINESS. INDUSTRY 4.0. How Industry 4.0 can reframe military readiness | Deloitte Insights

By topic By sector Spotlight Article Military readiness How emerging technologies can transform defense capabilities 16 July 2018 Dennis Schultz United States Joe Mariani United States Isaac Jenkins United States See more Readiness is an age-old focus for militaries. As budget pressures continue to build, digital resources that are now maturing—data science, cloud computing, andContinue reading “DELOITTE MILITARY READINESS. INDUSTRY 4.0. How Industry 4.0 can reframe military readiness | Deloitte Insights”

NETCENTS-2 l Deloitte US l U.S. Federal Government

Services NETCENTS-2 Solutions Enterprise Integration and Service Management NETCENTS-2 (NC-2) is a multiple award, multiple Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) program with an estimated value of $24.2B. The goal of NC-2 is to support the Air Force mission to deliver the right information, in the right format, to the right place, at the right time –Continue reading “NETCENTS-2 l Deloitte US l U.S. Federal Government”

deloitte chicago military contracts. – Google Search. WAS TOLD BIA A COWORKER THAT DELOITTE IS BEHIND WHAT HAPPENED TO ME WHICH IS WHY IM IN THIS TARGETING PROGRAM. I AM A STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES EMPLOYEE FOR THE KANKAKEE COUNTY OFFICE. DELOITTE CHICAGO AND DELOITTE LLC DOES DEFENSE, AEROSPACE, INTELLIGENCE CONTRACTS, and also COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, AI, AUGMENTING COMPUTER PROGRAMS, AND OTHER PROGRAMS ON BEHALF OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. I HAVE BEEN TARGETED SONCE 2015- CURRENT. HERE ATE JUST A GOOGLE LOOKUP OF DELOITTE DEFENSE CONTRACTS Search Results Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Web results NETCENTS-2 l Deloitte US l U.S. Federal Government Deloitte is a prime awardee under the NC-2 EISM contract, which is a multiple award IDIQ for the United States Air Force with a total contract … Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Defense, Security & Justice Services | Deloitte US Tax · Consulting · Audit & Assurance · Deloitte Private Company Services · Mergers & Acquisitions · Risk & Financial Advisory · Analytics · Cloud … Deloitte › pages › careers › articles Military Veterans | Deloitte US Military Vets. Eric Johnson | Consulting. I spent ten years as a US Army officer, deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan. When I decided to transition … Missing: contracts. ‎| Must include: contracts. Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Federal Government Contract Vehicles l Deloitte US These include Government-Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs), Multiple Agency Contracts ( MACs), General … Air Force NETCENTS 2 You visited this page on 3/17/19. Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Deloitte and SEAPORT-E | Deloitte US | U.S. Federal Government Learn more about this contract vehicle … A comprehensive portfolio of consulting, audit, tax and financial advisory services … Navy SEAPORT-E. Deloitte › us-ites-3s-contractPDF AWARD/CONTRACT – Deloitte Sep 25, 2018 · The US Army Contracting Command – Rock Island (ACC-RI) … In this contract vehicle, Deloitte Consulting LLP will provide … PEOPLE ALSO SEARCH FOR Deloitte government contracts Deloitte military recruiting Deloitte careers Deloitte Consulting careers Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Web results GSA Schedules | Deloitte US 541611. Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Grants … Financial and Business Solutions (FABS) GSA Schedule Contracts. Clearance Jobs › news › deloitte… Deloitte Wins $64M Navy Contract for Business and Tech Management Support … May 23, 2019 · Your source for Defense Contracts news and … Deloitte Consulting LLP, Arlington, Virginia, is awarded … Clearance Jobs › news › deloitte… Deloitte to Support DoD Personnel Vetting, Background Investigation Transfer from … Sep 28, 2018 · Your source for Defense Contracts news and security-cleared … Cherokee Nation Management & Consulting LLC, … GovCon Wire › s=deloitte deloitte | GovCon Wire A new Deloitte report has identified challenges U.S. defense contractors and suppliers face when … Mike Canning, a principal with Deloitte Consulting, has been named head of the company’s … Get the answer you’re looking for added to the web Your question will be shared anonymously with online publishers who may be interested in answering it Make sure you don’t include any private info Learn more By submitting a question you couldn’t find the answer to, you can help Google and publishers learn what info is missing from the web. Google will analyze your question and share it with publishers who may be interested in answering it. That means the next time you search for your question, you might find a new page with the answer. Please note that Google doesn’t write or control the content on web pages you find through Search. Because these questions are shared with publishers, please make sure you don’t submit any personal info (such as your phone number, email address, or credit card number) that you wouldn’t want shared publicly. Got it Submit RELATED SEARCHES Deloitte Navy contract Deloitte CORE Leadership Program Reddit Government IDIQ contract vehicles Deloitte recruiting Deloitte irvine Deloitte Defense Security and Justice jobs Work at Deloitte Deloitte portal

× Search Modes ALLNEWSIMAGESMAPSVIDEOSSHOPPINGBOOKSFLIGHTSSEARCH TOOLS Search Results Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Web results NETCENTS-2 l Deloitte US l U.S. Federal Government Deloitte is a prime awardee under the NC-2 EISM contract, which is a multiple award IDIQ for the United States Air Force with a total contract … Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Defense, SecurityContinue reading “deloitte chicago military contracts. – Google Search. WAS TOLD BIA A COWORKER THAT DELOITTE IS BEHIND WHAT HAPPENED TO ME WHICH IS WHY IM IN THIS TARGETING PROGRAM. I AM A STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES EMPLOYEE FOR THE KANKAKEE COUNTY OFFICE. DELOITTE CHICAGO AND DELOITTE LLC DOES DEFENSE, AEROSPACE, INTELLIGENCE CONTRACTS, and also COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, AI, AUGMENTING COMPUTER PROGRAMS, AND OTHER PROGRAMS ON BEHALF OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. I HAVE BEEN TARGETED SONCE 2015- CURRENT. HERE ATE JUST A GOOGLE LOOKUP OF DELOITTE DEFENSE CONTRACTS Search Results Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Web results NETCENTS-2 l Deloitte US l U.S. Federal Government Deloitte is a prime awardee under the NC-2 EISM contract, which is a multiple award IDIQ for the United States Air Force with a total contract … Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Defense, Security & Justice Services | Deloitte US Tax · Consulting · Audit & Assurance · Deloitte Private Company Services · Mergers & Acquisitions · Risk & Financial Advisory · Analytics · Cloud … Deloitte › pages › careers › articles Military Veterans | Deloitte US Military Vets. Eric Johnson | Consulting. I spent ten years as a US Army officer, deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan. When I decided to transition … Missing: contracts. ‎| Must include: contracts. Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Federal Government Contract Vehicles l Deloitte US These include Government-Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs), Multiple Agency Contracts ( MACs), General … Air Force NETCENTS 2 You visited this page on 3/17/19. Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Deloitte and SEAPORT-E | Deloitte US | U.S. Federal Government Learn more about this contract vehicle … A comprehensive portfolio of consulting, audit, tax and financial advisory services … Navy SEAPORT-E. Deloitte › us-ites-3s-contractPDF AWARD/CONTRACT – Deloitte Sep 25, 2018 · The US Army Contracting Command – Rock Island (ACC-RI) … In this contract vehicle, Deloitte Consulting LLP will provide … PEOPLE ALSO SEARCH FOR Deloitte government contracts Deloitte military recruiting Deloitte careers Deloitte Consulting careers Deloitte › public-sector › solutions Web results GSA Schedules | Deloitte US 541611. Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Grants … Financial and Business Solutions (FABS) GSA Schedule Contracts. Clearance Jobs › news › deloitte… Deloitte Wins $64M Navy Contract for Business and Tech Management Support … May 23, 2019 · Your source for Defense Contracts news and … Deloitte Consulting LLP, Arlington, Virginia, is awarded … Clearance Jobs › news › deloitte… Deloitte to Support DoD Personnel Vetting, Background Investigation Transfer from … Sep 28, 2018 · Your source for Defense Contracts news and security-cleared … Cherokee Nation Management & Consulting LLC, … GovCon Wire › s=deloitte deloitte | GovCon Wire A new Deloitte report has identified challenges U.S. defense contractors and suppliers face when … Mike Canning, a principal with Deloitte Consulting, has been named head of the company’s … Get the answer you’re looking for added to the web Your question will be shared anonymously with online publishers who may be interested in answering it Make sure you don’t include any private info Learn more By submitting a question you couldn’t find the answer to, you can help Google and publishers learn what info is missing from the web. Google will analyze your question and share it with publishers who may be interested in answering it. That means the next time you search for your question, you might find a new page with the answer. Please note that Google doesn’t write or control the content on web pages you find through Search. Because these questions are shared with publishers, please make sure you don’t submit any personal info (such as your phone number, email address, or credit card number) that you wouldn’t want shared publicly. Got it Submit RELATED SEARCHES Deloitte Navy contract Deloitte CORE Leadership Program Reddit Government IDIQ contract vehicles Deloitte recruiting Deloitte irvine Deloitte Defense Security and Justice jobs Work at Deloitte Deloitte portal”

From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory by  Colonel Paul E. Valley Commander with Major Michael A. Aquino PSYOP Research & Analysis Team Leader Headquarters, 7th Psychological Operations Group United States Army Reserve Presidio of San Francisco, California 1980 https://www.wanttoknow.info/mk/mindwar-michael-aquino.pdf From PSYOP to MindWar:The Psychology of Victory – Position Paper by US Colonel Paul E. Valley and Major Michael A. Aquino, PSYOP Research & Analysis Team Leader (1980) A report authored by then Major Aquino and Colonel Paul E. Vallely, titled “From Psyop to Mindwar.” This report bears a “Top Secret” notation and was circulated to the US “Psyop Community and the US Army War College, amongst others. While the address list on the copy in the possession of this writer has been mostly redacted, it is possible to make out the words “Office of the Chief of Staff” which suggests that a copy was also sent to the Joint Chiefs. Arguing that the US lost the Vietnam War not because they were outfought but, rather, “out-Psyoped” “in the streets of American cities,” the report called for greater emphasis to be placed on “MindWar” directed through the US Media. The report added that “coercive” measures if they are to work effectively must remain undetected. Delivery mechanisms for making targets “receptive to ideas” would, the report argued, need to take full advantage of the ability of electromagnetic weapons such as Extremely Low Frequency Waves (ELF). In other words, Mind Control technologies then in development. Aquino’s and Vallely’s study clearly hit the spot inside the Pentagon. Most of us are now aware that the military has for some years now, been able to manipulate news and “spin” the major media when it comes to reporting of US military involvement overseas. The lessons of being “Out-Psyoped” at home have been taken on board and are not to be repeated in the future. That the lesson was indeed learned was clearly demonstrated in the reporting of the 1991 Gulf War, when CNN stole the show due to the access it had to direct feeds from US military satellites. For those who continue to harbour doubts that mind control technologies form part of the US military arsenal, they need do no more than point their internet browser towards the US Navy’s Joint Programme Office – Special Technologies Countermeasures website and read about the Technical Information Exchange Group’s (TIEG) planned “special invitation only” conference hosted by the United Stated Special Operations Command at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida, scheduled for the Autumn 2002. The conference is designed to “facilitate the interaction and information exchange between the developers and users of special, nonkinetic technologies (my emphasis). [33] The category of “non-kinetic technologies listed for “operational planning” and discussion are as follows: * Electromagnetic Weapons * Acoustic Psycho-Correction * Chemical Attitude Adjustment * Visual Stimulation & Illusions * Material Degraders * Non-Penetrating Projectiles * Incapacitants * High Pressure Water Systems * Concealed Weapon Detection * Electronic Disablers * Acoustic Systems * Combustion Inhibition * Immobilizers * Olfactory Chemicals * Laser Systems Number two on this list, “Acoustic Psycho-Correction” is the self same “Mind Control” technology that has the ability to “control minds and alter behaviour of civilians and soldiers” and which also “involves the transmission of specific commands via static or white noise bands into the human subconscious without upsetting other intellectual functions,” that is aimed at altering the “behaviour on willing and unwilling subjects,” reported in the Defence News article discussed earlier on page 3. Text from “Masters of Persuasion” – by David Guyatt (2005) #NeuroScience #SE #InfoSec #BCI #Military #Cryptocracy

From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory by Colonel Paul E. Valley Commander with Major Michael A. Aquino PSYOP Research & Analysis Team Leader Headquarters, 7th Psychological Operations Group United States Army Reserve Presidio of San Francisco, California 1980 https://www.wanttoknow.info/mk/mindwar-michael-aquino.pdf

http://www.wanttoknow.info/mk/mindwar-michael-aquino.pdf

I am a targeted individual in KANKAKEE county Illinois since 2015 that I am aware of. SHADOW GOVERNMENT-ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX ​ LIST OF PARTNERS IS ALSO LISTED AS SHADOW GOVERNMENT MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES. THIS LIST IS UNDER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS URBANA CHAMPAIGN, UILABS, DMDII, MXD, CITYTECH FRONT COMPANIES, MILITARY CONTRACTORS FOR WHATS CALLED THE ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE BLOCKCHAIN INITIATIVE WHICH IS THE INTERNET OF THINGS. THESE AGENCIES ARE ALSO MENTIONED IN ELANA FREELANDS BOOK UNDER AN IONIZED SKY FROM CHEMTRAILS TO SPACEFENCE.

SHADOW GOVERNMENT-ILLINOIS SMARTSTATE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPLEX ​ LIST OF PARTNERS IS ALSO LISTED AS SHADOW GOVERNMENT MILITARY INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES. THIS LIST IS UNDER UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS URBANA CHAMPAIGN UILABS DMDII MXD CITYTECH FRONT COMPANIES. MENTIONED IN ELANA FREELANDS BOOK UNDER AN IONIZED SKY FROM CHEMTRAILS TO SPACEFENCE.

NSA Whistleblower Reveals Covert Torture Program on RT America – Activist Post

ALTERNATIVE NEWS & INDEPENDENT VIEWS HOME ACTIVISM NSA Whistleblower Reveals Covert Torture Program on RT America TOPICS:Chevalier De LorimierConspiracyDirected Energy WeaponsHuman RightsMind ControlNSAWhistleblowers JUNE 12, 2020 by Chevalier de Lorimier On April 11, 2020, the former Technical Director of the NSA, William Binney, and Pulitzer-prize winning Chris Hedges were discussing on RT America TV theContinue reading “NSA Whistleblower Reveals Covert Torture Program on RT America – Activist Post”

I became a victim in 2015 via my job with the state of Illinois. The department of defense has contracts under front companies uilabs. DMDII. MxD. CityTech using the university ILlinois urbana Urbana Champaign, military contractors for the Illinois SmartState blockchain Military Industrial Intelligence Complex using contracts for the internet of things. The military industrial complex used workplace mobbing, smearing, Harassment, aerial surveillance in Kankakee county Illinois. Chicago Quantum computing. Fusion centers CPIC (Chicago) AND STIC (Springfield Illinois).

http://www.youtube.com/watch

USC 1520A​ RESTRICTIONS ON THE HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIATION , OR NUCLEAR AGENTS US CODE 1520A- RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS [USC02] 50 USC Ch. 32: CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title50/chapter32&edition=prelim 50 U.S.C. 1520a – Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents * Summary Document in Context Publication Title United States Code, 1994 Edition, Supplement 3, Title 50 – WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE Category Bills and Statutes Collection United States Code SuDoc Class Number Y 1.2/5: Contained Within Title 50 – WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE CHAPTER 32 – CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM Sec. 1520a – Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents Contains section 1520a Date 1997 Laws In Effect As Of Date January 26, 1998 Positive Law No Disposition standard Source Credit Pub. L. 105-85, div. A, title X, §1078, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1915. Statutes at Large References 83 Stat. 209 111 Stat. 1915 Public Law References Public Law 91-121, Public Law 105-85 §1520. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1078(g), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1916, and Pub. L. 105–277, div. I, title VI, §601, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–886 Section, Pub. L. 95–79, title VIII, §808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334; Pub. L. 97–375, title II, §203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1822, related to use by the Department of Defense of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents, accounting to congressional committees with respect to experiments and studies, and notification of local civilian officials. §1520a. Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents (a) Prohibited activities The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)— (1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or (2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects. (b) Exceptions Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes: (1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity. (2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents. (3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control. (c) Informed consent required The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject. (d) Prior notice to Congress Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees. (e) “Biological agent” defined In this section, the term “biological agent” means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing— (1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; (2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or (3) deleterious alteration of the environment. (Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1078, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1915; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1067(4), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774.) Codification Section is comprised of section 1078 of Pub. L. 105–85. Subsec. (f) of section 1078 of Pub. L. 105–85 amended section 1523(b) of this title. Subsec. (g) of section 1078 of Pub. L. 105–85 repealed section 1520 of this title. Section was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998, and not as part of Pub. L. 91–121, title IV, §409, Nov. 19, 1969, 83 Stat. 209, which comprises this chapter. Amendments 1999—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted “and the Committee on Armed Services” for “and the Committee on National Security”.

§1520. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1078(g), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1916, and Pub. L. 105–277, div. I, title VI, §601, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–886 Section, Pub. L. 95–79, title VIII, §808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334; Pub. L. 97–375, title II, §203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat.Continue reading “USC 1520A​ RESTRICTIONS ON THE HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIATION , OR NUCLEAR AGENTS US CODE 1520A- RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS [USC02] 50 USC Ch. 32: CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title50/chapter32&edition=prelim 50 U.S.C. 1520a – Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents * Summary Document in Context Publication Title United States Code, 1994 Edition, Supplement 3, Title 50 – WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE Category Bills and Statutes Collection United States Code SuDoc Class Number Y 1.2/5: Contained Within Title 50 – WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE CHAPTER 32 – CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM Sec. 1520a – Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents Contains section 1520a Date 1997 Laws In Effect As Of Date January 26, 1998 Positive Law No Disposition standard Source Credit Pub. L. 105-85, div. A, title X, §1078, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1915. Statutes at Large References 83 Stat. 209 111 Stat. 1915 Public Law References Public Law 91-121, Public Law 105-85 §1520. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1078(g), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1916, and Pub. L. 105–277, div. I, title VI, §601, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–886 Section, Pub. L. 95–79, title VIII, §808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334; Pub. L. 97–375, title II, §203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1822, related to use by the Department of Defense of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents, accounting to congressional committees with respect to experiments and studies, and notification of local civilian officials. §1520a. Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents (a) Prohibited activities The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)— (1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or (2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects. (b) Exceptions Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes: (1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity. (2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents. (3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control. (c) Informed consent required The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject. (d) Prior notice to Congress Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees. (e) “Biological agent” defined In this section, the term “biological agent” means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing— (1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; (2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or (3) deleterious alteration of the environment. (Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1078, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1915; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1067(4), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774.) Codification Section is comprised of section 1078 of Pub. L. 105–85. Subsec. (f) of section 1078 of Pub. L. 105–85 amended section 1523(b) of this title. Subsec. (g) of section 1078 of Pub. L. 105–85 repealed section 1520 of this title. Section was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998, and not as part of Pub. L. 91–121, title IV, §409, Nov. 19, 1969, 83 Stat. 209, which comprises this chapter. Amendments 1999—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted “and the Committee on Armed Services” for “and the Committee on National Security”.”

United States—Masters of Space? The US Space Command’s “Vision for 2020” Thoughts by Jonathan Granoff, President, Global Security Institute, and Craig Eisendrath, Senior Fellow, Center for International Policy United States—Masters of Space? The US Space Command’s “Vision for 2020” https://gsinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/s3/assets/docs/Vision2020_Analysis.pdf

gsinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/s3/assets/docs/Vision2020_Analysis.pdf